activity
20212026
most citedRationalizing Predictions by Adversarial Information Calibration

9 citations · 17 across the 16 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

16 papers

cs.CV2026

Counterfactual Tests for Measuring Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness in Visual Language Models

Bayar Menzat, Maximilian Süss, Ruizhi Wang +3

Chain-of-thought (CoT) may often look plausible, yet it may not faithfully reflect the model's decision-making process. While methods for measuring the faithfulness of CoTs for tex…

cs.LG2026

Training Large Language Models for Self-Explanation Faithfulness

Yeoktatt Cheah, María Pérez-Ortiz, Noah Y. Siegel +1

We propose a Reinforcement Learning (RL) method to directly optimize the faithfulness of self-explanations - the extent to which a model's generated reasoning accurately reflects i…

cs.LG2026

Biases in the Blind Spot: Detecting What LLMs Fail to Mention

Iván Arcuschin, David Chanin, Adrià Garriga-Alonso +1

Large Language Models (LLMs) often provide chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning traces that appear plausible, but may hide internal biases. We call these unverbalized biases. Monitorin…

cs.CL2025

Verbosity Tradeoffs and the Impact of Scale on the Faithfulness of LLM Self-Explanations

Noah Y. Siegel, Nicolas Heess, Maria Perez-Ortiz +1

When asked to explain their decisions, LLMs can often give explanations which sound plausible to humans. But are these explanations faithful, i.e. do they convey the factors actual…

cs.CL2025

AnnoCaseLaw: Legal Annotation Benchmark of Civil Negligence

Magnus Sesodia, Rilton Franzone, Alina Petrova +7

Language models offer a way to scale costly, labour-intensive expert annotation, but their ability to reproduce expert judgements remains uncertain. This is particularly challengin…

cs.HC2024★ 1 cited

Fool Me Once? Contrasting Textual and Visual Explanations in a Clinical Decision-Support Setting

Maxime Kayser, Bayar Menzat, Cornelius Emde +7

The growing capabilities of AI models are leading to their wider use, including in safety-critical domains. Explainable AI (XAI) aims to make these models safer to use by making th…

cs.CY2024

iLLuMinaTE: An LLM-XAI Framework Leveraging Social Science Explanation Theories Towards Actionable Student Performance Feedback

Vinitra Swamy, Davide Romano, Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan +2

Recent advances in eXplainable AI (XAI) for education have highlighted a critical challenge: ensuring that explanations for state-of-the-art AI models are understandable for non-te…

cs.CL2024

The Probabilities Also Matter: A More Faithful Metric for Faithfulness of Free-Text Explanations in Large Language Models

Noah Y. Siegel, Oana-Maria Camburu, Nicolas Heess +1

In order to oversee advanced AI systems, it is important to understand their underlying decision-making process. When prompted, large language models (LLMs) can provide natural lan…

cs.CL2023

Identifying Linear Relational Concepts in Large Language Models

David Chanin, Anthony Hunter, Oana-Maria Camburu

Transformer language models (LMs) have been shown to represent concepts as directions in the latent space of hidden activations. However, for any human-interpretable concept, how c…

cs.CL2023

Faithfulness Tests for Natural Language Explanations

Pepa Atanasova, Oana-Maria Camburu, Christina Lioma +3

Explanations of neural models aim to reveal a model's decision-making process for its predictions. However, recent work shows that current methods giving explanations such as salie…

cs.CL2023

KNOW How to Make Up Your Mind! Adversarially Detecting and Alleviating Inconsistencies in Natural Language Explanations

Myeongjun Jang, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Julian McAuley +2

While recent works have been considerably improving the quality of the natural language explanations (NLEs) generated by a model to justify its predictions, there is very limited r…

cs.CL2023

Counter-GAP: Counterfactual Bias Evaluation through Gendered Ambiguous Pronouns

Zhongbin Xie, Vid Kocijan, Thomas Lukasiewicz +1

Bias-measuring datasets play a critical role in detecting biased behavior of language models and in evaluating progress of bias mitigation methods. In this work, we focus on evalua…

cs.CL2023★ 9 cited

Rationalizing Predictions by Adversarial Information Calibration

Lei Sha, Oana-Maria Camburu, Thomas Lukasiewicz

Explaining the predictions of AI models is paramount in safety-critical applications, such as in legal or medical domains. One form of explanation for a prediction is an extractive…

cs.CV2022

Explaining Chest X-ray Pathologies in Natural Language

Maxime Kayser, Cornelius Emde, Oana-Maria Camburu +3

Most deep learning algorithms lack explanations for their predictions, which limits their deployment in clinical practice. Approaches to improve explainability, especially in medic…

cs.CL2021★ 1 cited

Few-Shot Out-of-Domain Transfer Learning of Natural Language Explanations in a Label-Abundant Setup

Yordan Yordanov, Vid Kocijan, Thomas Lukasiewicz +1

Training a model to provide natural language explanations (NLEs) for its predictions usually requires the acquisition of task-specific NLEs, which is time- and resource-consuming.…

cs.CL2021★ 6 cited

Knowledge-Grounded Self-Rationalization via Extractive and Natural Language Explanations

Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Oana-Maria Camburu, Thomas Lukasiewicz +1

Models that generate extractive rationales (i.e., subsets of features) or natural language explanations (NLEs) for their predictions are important for explainable AI. While an extr…