activity
20232025
most citedFine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!

41 citations · 61 across the 12 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

12 papers

cs.SD2025

The Model Hears You: Audio Language Model Deployments Should Consider the Principle of Least Privilege

Luxi He, Xiangyu Qi, Michel Liao +4

The latest Audio Language Models (Audio LMs) process speech directly instead of relying on a separate transcription step. This shift preserves detailed information, such as intonat…

cs.CR2024

On Evaluating the Durability of Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMs

Xiangyu Qi, Boyi Wei, Nicholas Carlini +7

Stakeholders -- from model developers to policymakers -- seek to minimize the dual-use risks of large language models (LLMs). An open challenge to this goal is whether technical sa…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety

Jakub Łucki, Boyi Wei, Yangsibo Huang +3

Large language models are finetuned to refuse questions about hazardous knowledge, but these protections can often be bypassed. Unlearning methods aim at completely removing hazard…

cs.CR2024★ 4 cited

Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep

Xiangyu Qi, Ashwinee Panda, Kaifeng Lyu +5

The safety alignment of current Large Language Models (LLMs) is vulnerable. Relatively simple attacks, or even benign fine-tuning, can jailbreak aligned models. We argue that many…

cs.CV2024

JIGMARK: A Black-Box Approach for Enhancing Image Watermarks against Diffusion Model Edits

Minzhou Pan, Yi Zeng, Xue Lin +4

In this study, we investigate the vulnerability of image watermarks to diffusion-model-based image editing, a challenge exacerbated by the computational cost of accessing gradient…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Models

Boyi Wei, Weijia Shi, Yangsibo Huang +5

Language models (LMs) derive their capabilities from extensive training on diverse data, including potentially copyrighted material. These models can memorize and generate content…

cs.AI2024★ 6 cited

SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusal

Tinghao Xie, Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng +13

Evaluating aligned large language models' (LLMs) ability to recognize and reject unsafe user requests is crucial for safe, policy-compliant deployments. Existing evaluation efforts…

cs.CV2024★ 2 cited

Fantastic Copyrighted Beasts and How (Not) to Generate Them

Luxi He, Yangsibo Huang, Weijia Shi +7

Recent studies show that image and video generation models can be prompted to reproduce copyrighted content from their training data, raising serious legal concerns about copyright…

cs.CR2024★ 2 cited

AI Risk Management Should Incorporate Both Safety and Security

Xiangyu Qi, Yangsibo Huang, Yi Zeng +22

The exposure of security vulnerabilities in safety-aligned language models, e.g., susceptibility to adversarial attacks, has shed light on the intricate interplay between AI safety…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

What is in Your Safe Data? Identifying Benign Data that Breaks Safety

Luxi He, Mengzhou Xia, Peter Henderson

Current Large Language Models (LLMs), even those tuned for safety and alignment, are susceptible to jailbreaking. Some have found that just further fine-tuning an aligned model wit…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modifications

Boyi Wei, Kaixuan Huang, Yangsibo Huang +6

Large language models (LLMs) show inherent brittleness in their safety mechanisms, as evidenced by their susceptibility to jailbreaking and even non-malicious fine-tuning. This stu…

cs.CL2023★ 41 cited

Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!

Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie +4

Optimizing large language models (LLMs) for downstream use cases often involves the customization of pre-trained LLMs through further fine-tuning. Meta's open release of Llama mode…