most citedThe illusion of artificial inclusion

57 citations · 60 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CY2025★ 3 cited

The Case for "Thick Evaluations" of Cultural Representation in AI

Rida Qadri, Mark Diaz, Ding Wang +1

Generative AI model outputs have been increasingly evaluated for their (in)ability to represent non-Western cultures. We argue that these evaluations often operate through reductiv…

cs.CY2025

Decoding Safety Feedback from Diverse Raters: A Data-driven Lens on Responsiveness to Severity

Pushkar Mishra, Charvi Rastogi, Stephen R. Pfohl +9

Ensuring the safety of Generative AI requires a nuanced understanding of pluralistic viewpoints. In this paper, we introduce a novel data-driven approach for analyzing ordinal safe…

cs.AI2024

Insights on Disagreement Patterns in Multimodal Safety Perception across Diverse Rater Groups

Charvi Rastogi, Tian Huey Teh, Pushkar Mishra +10

AI systems crucially rely on human ratings, but these ratings are often aggregated, obscuring the inherent diversity of perspectives in real-world phenomenon. This is particularly…

cs.AI2024

STAR: SocioTechnical Approach to Red Teaming Language Models

Laura Weidinger, John Mellor, Bernat Guillen Pegueroles +9

This research introduces STAR, a sociotechnical framework that improves on current best practices for red teaming safety of large language models. STAR makes two key contributions:…

cs.CY2024★ 57 cited

The illusion of artificial inclusion

William Agnew, A. Stevie Bergman, Jennifer Chien +5

Human participants play a central role in the development of modern artificial intelligence (AI) technology, in psychological science, and in user research. Recent advances in gene…