activity
20232026
most citedToward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systems

3 citations · 12 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

9 papers

cs.CY2026

What AI Benchmarks Actually Measure: Adapting Convergent and Discriminant Validity to Interrogate Fifty-Six AI Benchmarks

Meera Desai, Sang T. Truong, Hanna Wallach +8

Benchmarks play a central role in the development and governance of models, yet it is often unclear whether they actually measure the concepts they purport to measure (e.g., reason…

cs.HC2026

What We Know about Responsible AI Practices in Industry: A Half Decade of Empirical Research

Wesley Hanwen Deng, Agathe Balayn, Andrew Selbst +6

Responsible AI (RAI) has become a central concern for technology companies, regulators, and the public. How industry practitioners interpret, implement, and sustain RAI work direct…

cs.AI2025★ 3 cited

Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systems

Laura Weidinger, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Hanna Wallach +7

There is an increasing imperative to anticipate and understand the performance and safety of generative AI systems in real-world deployment contexts. However, the current evaluatio…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

Position: Evaluating Generative AI Systems Is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, A. Feder Cooper +17

The measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems lack sufficient scientific rigor, leading to what has been described as "a tangle of sloppy tests [and] a…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Machine Unlearning Doesn't Do What You Think: Lessons for Generative AI Policy and Research

A. Feder Cooper, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Miranda Bogen +34

"Machine unlearning" is a popular proposed solution for mitigating the existence of content in an AI model that is problematic for legal or moral reasons, including privacy, copyri…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

Dimensions of Generative AI Evaluation Design

P. Alex Dow, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Solon Barocas +3

There are few principles or guidelines to ensure evaluations of generative AI (GenAI) models and systems are effective. To help address this gap, we propose a set of general dimens…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

Evaluating Generative AI Systems is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, Nicholas Pangakis +17

Across academia, industry, and government, there is an increasing awareness that the measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems are especially difficult…

cs.CL2024

DANSK and DaCy 2.6.0: Domain Generalization of Danish Named Entity Recognition

Kenneth Enevoldsen, Emil Trenckner Jessen, Rebekah Baglini

Named entity recognition is one of the cornerstones of Danish NLP, essential for language technology applications within both industry and research. However, Danish NER is inhibite…

cs.CL2023★ 2 cited

A Framework for Automated Measurement of Responsible AI Harms in Generative AI Applications

Ahmed Magooda, Alec Helyar, Kyle Jackson +14

We present a framework for the automated measurement of responsible AI (RAI) metrics for large language models (LLMs) and associated products and services. Our framework for automa…