19 citations · 69 across the 15 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
Can AI agents conduct open-ended AI research? Early evidence from two case studies
Peter Kirgis, Sayash Kapoor, Andrew Schwartz +21
Forecasts of explosive AI progress hinge on AI agents automating AI research. But evidence on whether agents can carry out open-ended AI research is thin. Current evaluations eithe…
FLARE-AI: Flaw Reporting for AI
Shayne Longpre, Elaine Zhu, Carson Ezell +15
Flaw reporting for deployed AI systems is fundamental to identifying system failures and improving AI safety. Yet the AI reporting ecosystem is fragmented: researchers who identify…
Life After Benchmark Saturation: A Case Study of CORE-Bench
Nitya Nadgir, Sayash Kapoor, Kangheng Liu +11
When a benchmark's accuracy saturates, it is often retired and replaced with a more challenging version. We show that this approach privileges accuracy and misses the opportunity t…
Open-World Evaluations for Measuring Frontier AI Capabilities
Sayash Kapoor, Peter Kirgis, Andrew Schwartz +15
Benchmark-based evaluation remains important for tracking frontier AI progress. But it can both overstate and understate deployed capability because it privileges tasks that can be…
Towards a Science of AI Agent Reliability
Stephan Rabanser, Sayash Kapoor, Peter Kirgis +3
AI agents are increasingly deployed to execute important tasks. While rising accuracy scores on standard benchmarks suggest rapid progress, many agents still continue to fail in pr…