activity
20232026
most citedUnravelling Responsibility for AI

7 citations · 14 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.LG2026

Causal Explanations from the Geometric Properties of ReLU Neural Networks

Hector Woods, Philippa Ryan, Rob Alexander

Neural networks have proved an effective means of learning control policies for autonomous systems, but these learned policies are difficult to understand due to the black-box natu…

cs.CY2025★ 4 cited

The BIG Argument for AI Safety Cases

Ibrahim Habli, Richard Hawkins, Colin Paterson +4

We present our Balanced, Integrated and Grounded (BIG) argument for assuring the safety of AI systems. The BIG argument adopts a whole-system approach to constructing a safety case…

cs.CY2024

Fair by design: A sociotechnical approach to justifying the fairness of AI-enabled systems across the lifecycle

Marten H. L. Kaas, Christopher Burr, Zoe Porter +6

Fairness is one of the most commonly identified ethical principles in existing AI guidelines, and the development of fair AI-enabled systems is required by new and emerging AI regu…

cs.CY2023★ 3 cited

What's my role? Modelling responsibility for AI-based safety-critical systems

Philippa Ryan, Zoe Porter, Joanna Al-Qaddoumi +2

AI-Based Safety-Critical Systems (AI-SCS) are being increasingly deployed in the real world. These can pose a risk of harm to people and the environment. Reducing that risk is an o…

cs.AI2023★ 7 cited

Unravelling Responsibility for AI

Zoe Porter, Philippa Ryan, Phillip Morgan +5

It is widely acknowledged that we need to establish where responsibility lies for the outputs and impacts of AI-enabled systems. This is important to achieve justice and compensati…