most citedLLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations

15 citations · 16 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.AI2025

A Benchmark for Scalable Oversight Protocols

Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jackson Kaunismaa, Arjun Panickssery

As AI agents surpass human capabilities, scalable oversight -- the problem of effectively supplying human feedback to potentially superhuman AI models -- becomes increasingly criti…

cs.AI2024

Analyzing Probabilistic Methods for Evaluating Agent Capabilities

Axel Højmark, Govind Pimpale, Arjun Panickssery +2

To mitigate risks from AI systems, we need to assess their capabilities accurately. This is especially difficult in cases where capabilities are only rarely displayed. Phuong et al…

cs.CR2024★ 1 cited

Future Events as Backdoor Triggers: Investigating Temporal Vulnerabilities in LLMs

Sara Price, Arjun Panickssery, Sam Bowman +1

Backdoors are hidden behaviors that are only triggered once an AI system has been deployed. Bad actors looking to create successful backdoors must design them to avoid activation d…

cs.CL2024★ 15 cited

LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations

Arjun Panickssery, Samuel R. Bowman, Shi Feng

Self-evaluation using large language models (LLMs) has proven valuable not only in benchmarking but also methods like reward modeling, constitutional AI, and self-refinement. But n…

cs.CL2024

REBUS: A Robust Evaluation Benchmark of Understanding Symbols

Andrew Gritsevskiy, Arjun Panickssery, Aaron Kirtland +7

We propose a new benchmark evaluating the performance of multimodal large language models on rebus puzzles. The dataset covers 333 original examples of image-based wordplay, cluing…