activity
20242026
most citedWhat Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?

5 citations · 5 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2026Show all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2026

Behaviour analysis for large language model-driven agents

Tianqiang Yan, Lizhen Qu

Understanding language-agent behaviour requires learning how actions are organised across a trajectory and how this organisation relates to context and outcomes. We propose a gener…

cs.CL2026

ReGround: Grounding Reviewer Comments in Multimodal Evidence

Serwar Basch, Lizhen Qu, Iryna Gurevych

Reviewer comments naturally relate to specific parts of the reviewed paper, yet grounding these comments to the underlying evidence is difficult due to long multimodal documents. E…

cs.CL2026

Judgment-Grounded Expansion for Peer Review Generation

Sheng Lu, Lizhen Qu, Iryna Gurevych

Automatic review generation is a promising direction for accelerating scientific progress. While most work adopts an end-to-end setup, its fully automated nature makes it less suit…

cs.CL2026

Reviewing the Reviewer: LLM-Assisted Reviewer Feedback Generation for Guideline Compliance

Sukannya Purkayastha, Qile Wan, Anne Lauscher +2

Peer review is central to scientific quality, yet reliance on simple heuristics, namely lazy thinking and non-specific critiques, has threatened review quality. Prior work frames l…

cs.CL2026

ReBeCA: Causality-Inspired Behavior Analysis for Understanding the Self-Reflection of Language Models

Tianqiang Yan, Lizhen Qu, Sihan Shang +6

Self-reflection is a basic self-improvement skill of language agents, yet it does not reliably improve their outputs, where the underlying behavioral mechanism remains opaque. We i…