activity
20222026
most citedIdentification of consideration sets from choice data

2 citations · 3 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing econ.THShow all

8 papers · 1 filter

econ.TH2026

The Effects of Social Pressure on Fundamental Choices: Indecisiveness and Deferral

Alfio Giarlotta, M. Ali Khan, Angelo Enrico Petralia +1

In mainstream neoclassical economics, utility maximization is the only engine of individual action, and the other or the social, if it is modeled for decisions deemed fundamental,…

econ.TH2026

A measure of choice irrationality based on opposite judgements

Angelo Enrico Petralia

In many choice settings the decision maker (DM) adopts a criterion which is a mediation between her preference and its opposite. According to such compromise, the first i alternati…

econ.TH2025

Separable joint choices

Davide Carpentiere, Alfio Giarlotta, Angelo Petralia +1

We introduce a novel choice dataset, called joint choice, in which options and menus are multidimensional. In this general setting, we define a notion of choice separability, which…

econ.TH2025

Limited attention and models of choice: A behavioral equivalence

Davide Carpentiere, Angelo Petralia

We show that many models of choice can be alternatively represented as special cases of choice with limited attention (Masatlioglu, Nakajima, and Ozbay, 2012), singling out the pro…

econ.TH2024

Harmful Random Utility Models

Angelo Enrico Petralia

In many choice problems the evaluation of alternatives is determined by a mediation between opposite judgments. In these situations the decision maker (DM) may not maximize her tru…

econ.TH2023★ 2 cited

Identification of consideration sets from choice data

Davide Carpentiere, Angelo Petralia

We show that many bounded rationality patterns of choice can be alternatively represented as testable models of limited consideration, and we elicit the features of the associated…

econ.TH2022★ 1 cited

On the number of non-isomorphic choices on four elements

Alfio Giarlotta, Angelo Petralia, Stephen Watson

We use a combinatorial approach to compute the number of non-isomorphic choices on four elements that can be explained by models of bounded rationality.

econ.TH2022

Semantics meets attractiveness: Choice by salience

Alfio Giarlotta, Angelo Petralia, Stephen Watson

We describe a context-sensitive model of choice, in which the selection process is shaped not only by the attractiveness of items but also by their semantics ('salience'). All item…