4 citations · 7 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
Taking out the Toxic Trash: Recovering Precision in Mixed Flow-Sensitive Static Analyses
Fabian Stemmler, Michael Schwarz, Julian Erhard +2
Static analysis of real-world programs combines flow- and context-sensitive analyses of local program states with computation of flow- and context-insensitive invariants at globals…
Correctness Witnesses for Concurrent Programs: Bridging the Semantic Divide with Ghosts (Extended Version)
Julian Erhard, Manuel Bentele, Matthias Heizmann +7
Static analyzers are typically complex tools and thus prone to contain bugs themselves. To increase the trust in the verdict of such tools, witnesses encode key reasoning steps und…
Non-Numerical Weakly Relational Domains
Helmut Seidl, Julian Erhard, Sarah Tilscher +1
The weakly relational domain of Octagons offers a decent compromise between precision and efficiency for numerical properties. Here, we are concerned with the construction of non-n…
Correctness Witness Validation by Abstract Interpretation
Simmo Saan, Michael Schwarz, Julian Erhard +3
Witnesses record automated program analysis results and make them exchangeable. To validate correctness witnesses through abstract interpretation, we introduce a novel abstract ope…
Interactive Abstract Interpretation: Reanalyzing Whole Programs for Cheap
Julian Erhard, Simmo Saan, Sarah Tilscher +4
To put static program analysis at the fingertips of the software developer, we propose a framework for interactive abstract interpretation. While providing sound analysis results,…