activity
20232026
most citedNuclear Deployed: Analyzing Catastrophic Risks in Decision-making of Autonomous LLM Agents

3 citations · 8 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

10 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

AwarenessBench: Assessing Cognitive Capabilities of Language Models

Xiaojian Li, Rongwu Xu, Tianyun Zhang +9

As language models (LMs) exhibit increasingly consciousness-like behaviors, evaluating their cognitive abilities becomes essential. We introduce AwarenessBench, the first comprehen…

cs.CL2026

Before the Script, Set the Stage: How Worldview Simulation Amplifies Psychologically Grounded Persuasion in Multi-Turn Jailbreaking

Siyu Chen, Haoran Wang, Xiaojian Li +3

Multi-turn jailbreak attacks demonstrate that harmful intent can be distributed across dialogue, yet existing methods obscure what conversational mechanisms drive vulnerability. We…

cs.CL2025

Detecting LLM-Generated Spam Reviews by Integrating Language Model Embeddings and Graph Neural Network

Xin Liu, Rongwu Xu, Xinyi Jia +4

The rise of large language models (LLMs) has enabled the generation of highly persuasive spam reviews that closely mimic human writing. These reviews pose significant challenges fo…

cs.CL2025★ 3 cited

Nuclear Deployed: Analyzing Catastrophic Risks in Decision-making of Autonomous LLM Agents

Rongwu Xu, Xiaojian Li, Shuo Chen +1

Large language models (LLMs) are evolving into autonomous decision-makers, raising concerns about catastrophic risks in high-stakes scenarios, particularly in Chemical, Biological,…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

LongRAG: Evaluating Long-Context & Long-Form Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Key Point Recall

Zehan Qi, Rongwu Xu, Zhijiang Guo +3

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a promising approach to address the limitations of fixed knowledge in large language models (LLMs). However, current benchmarks for evaluati…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

DebateQA: Evaluating Question Answering on Debatable Knowledge

Rongwu Xu, Xuan Qi, Zehan Qi +2

The rise of large language models (LLMs) has enabled us to seek answers to inherently debatable questions on LLM chatbots, necessitating a reliable way to evaluate their ability. H…

cs.CL2024

Walking in Others' Shoes: How Perspective-Taking Guides Large Language Models in Reducing Toxicity and Bias

Rongwu Xu, Zi'an Zhou, Tianwei Zhang +5

The common toxicity and societal bias in contents generated by large language models (LLMs) necessitate strategies to reduce harm. Present solutions often demand white-box access t…

cs.CL2024

Course-Correction: Safety Alignment Using Synthetic Preferences

Rongwu Xu, Yishuo Cai, Zhenhong Zhou +6

The risk of harmful content generated by large language models (LLMs) becomes a critical concern. This paper presents a systematic study on assessing and improving LLMs' capability…

cs.CL2024

Preemptive Answer "Attacks" on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Rongwu Xu, Zehan Qi, Wei Xu

Large language models (LLMs) showcase impressive reasoning capabilities when coupled with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. However, the robustness of this approach warrants furthe…

cs.CL2023★ 3 cited

The Earth is Flat because...: Investigating LLMs' Belief towards Misinformation via Persuasive Conversation

Rongwu Xu, Brian S. Lin, Shujian Yang +6

Large language models (LLMs) encapsulate vast amounts of knowledge but still remain vulnerable to external misinformation. Existing research mainly studied this susceptibility beha…