3 papers
cs.CY2025
How May U.S. Courts Scrutinize Their Recidivism Risk Assessment Tools? Contextualizing AI Fairness Criteria on a Judicial Scrutiny-based Framework
Tin Nguyen, Jiannan Xu, Phuong-Anh Nguyen-Le +4
The AI/HCI and legal communities have developed largely independent conceptualizations of fairness. This conceptual difference hinders the potential incorporation of technical fair…
cs.AI2025
Effort-aware Fairness: Incorporating a Philosophy-informed, Human-centered Notion of Effort into Algorithmic Fairness Metrics
Tin Trung Nguyen, Jiannan Xu, Zora Che +6
Although popularized AI fairness metrics, e.g., demographic parity, have uncovered bias in AI-assisted decision-making outcomes, they do not consider how much effort one has spent…
cs.CY2025
Which Demographic Features Are Relevant for Individual Fairness Evaluation of U.S. Recidivism Risk Assessment Tools?
Tin Trung Nguyen, Jiannan Xu, Phuong-Anh Nguyen-Le +4
Despite its constitutional relevance, the technical ``individual fairness'' criterion has not been operationalized in U.S. state or federal statutes/regulations. We conduct a human…