activity
20242026
most citedBIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Data

4 citations · 12 across the 16 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

18 papers

cs.CY2026

Public Perceptions and Acceptance of Socially Intelligent AI Agents

Leena Mathur, Jenny T. Liang, Vasudha Varadarajan +6

AI researchers have been advancing socially intelligent AI agents (Social-AI) across embodiments, from chatbots to physical robots. As Social-AI agents move from labs into everyday…

cs.MA2026

SOTOPIA-TOM: Evaluating Privacy and Information Management in Multi-Agent Interaction with Theory of Mind

Yashwanth YS, Ruichen Wang, Shihua Zeng +4

As LLM-based agents are increasingly interacting in multi-party settings, they need to properly handle information asymmetry, i.e., knowing when and to whom to disclose information…

cs.CL2026

On Safety Risks in Experience-Driven Self-Evolving Agents

Weixiang Zhao, Yichen Zhang, Yingshuo Wang +8

Experience-driven self-evolution has emerged as a promising paradigm for improving the autonomy of large language model agents, yet its reliance on self-curated experience introduc…

cs.CL2026

Imperfectly Cooperative Human-AI Interactions: Comparing the Impacts of Human and AI Attributes in Simulated and User Studies

Myke C. Cohen, Mingqian Zheng, Neel Bhandari +6

AI design characteristics and human personality traits each impact the quality and outcomes of human-AI interactions. However, their relative and joint impacts are underexplored in…

cs.AI2026

GoodPoint: Learning Constructive Scientific Paper Feedback from Author Responses

Jimin Mun, Chani Jung, Xuhui Zhou +2

While LLMs hold significant potential to transform scientific research, we advocate for their use to augment and empower researchers rather than to automate research without human…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

The PIMMUR Principles: Ensuring Validity in Collective Behavior of LLM Societies

Jiaxu Zhou, Jen-tse Huang, Xuhui Zhou +5

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human collective behavior, yet claims that such simulations are human-like remain largely untested. We conducted a sy…

cs.AI2025

Social World Models

Xuhui Zhou, Jiarui Liu, Akhila Yerukola +2

Humans intuitively navigate social interactions by simulating unspoken dynamics and reasoning about others' perspectives, even with limited information. In contrast, AI systems str…

cs.AI2025

1-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoning

Wenkai Li, Liwen Sun, Zhenxiang Guan +2

Addressing contextual privacy concerns remains challenging in interactive settings where large language models (LLMs) process information from multiple sources (e.g., summarizing m…

cs.CL2025

SoMi-ToM: Evaluating Multi-Perspective Theory of Mind in Embodied Social Interactions

Xianzhe Fan, Xuhui Zhou, Chuanyang Jin +3

Humans continuously infer the states, goals, and behaviors of others by perceiving their surroundings in dynamic, real-world social interactions. However, most Theory of Mind (ToM)…

cs.CL2025

Words Like Knives: Backstory-Personalized Modeling and Detection of Violent Communication

Jocelyn Shen, Akhila Yerukola, Xuhui Zhou +3

Conversational breakdowns in close relationships are deeply shaped by personal histories and emotional context, yet most NLP research treats conflict detection as a general task, o…

cs.CY2025

SOTOPIA-S4: a user-friendly system for flexible, customizable, and large-scale social simulation

Xuhui Zhou, Zhe Su, Sophie Feng +9

Social simulation through large language model (LLM) agents is a promising approach to explore and validate hypotheses related to social science questions and LLM agents behavior.…

cs.HC2025★ 2 cited

Rethinking Theory of Mind Benchmarks for LLMs: Towards A User-Centered Perspective

Qiaosi Wang, Xuhui Zhou, Maarten Sap +2

The last couple of years have witnessed emerging research that appropriates Theory-of-Mind (ToM) tasks designed for humans to benchmark LLM's ToM capabilities as an indication of L…

cs.HC2024★ 1 cited

How Do Users Negotiate Harmful Value Conflicts with AI Companions? A Study with Minion, a Technology Probe for In-Situ Human-AI Conflict Response

Xianzhe Fan, Qing Xiao, Xuhui Zhou +4

AI companions increasingly sustain long-term, emotionally engaging relationships but can also make discriminatory remarks or exert control, leaving users to manage harmful conflict…

cs.CL2024★ 4 cited

BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Data

Wenkai Li, Jiarui Liu, Andy Liu +3

In this work, we tackle the challenge of embedding realistic human personality traits into LLMs. Previous approaches have primarily focused on prompt-based methods that describe th…

cs.AI2024★ 1 cited

HAICOSYSTEM: An Ecosystem for Sandboxing Safety Risks in Human-AI Interactions

Xuhui Zhou, Hyunwoo Kim, Faeze Brahman +9

AI agents are increasingly autonomous in their interactions with human users and tools, leading to increased interactional safety risks. We present HAICOSYSTEM, a framework examini…

cs.AI2024

AI-LieDar: Examine the Trade-off Between Utility and Truthfulness in LLM Agents

Zhe Su, Xuhui Zhou, Sanketh Rangreji +4

Truthfulness (adherence to factual accuracy) and utility (satisfying human needs and instructions) are both fundamental aspects of Large Language Models, yet these goals often conf…

cs.HC2024★ 2 cited

User-Driven Value Alignment: Understanding Users' Perceptions and Strategies for Addressing Biased and Discriminatory Statements in AI Companions

Xianzhe Fan, Qing Xiao, Xuhui Zhou +4

Large language model-based AI companions are increasingly viewed by users as friends or romantic partners, leading to deep emotional bonds. However, they can generate biased, discr…

cs.AI2024★ 1 cited

On the Resilience of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration with Faulty Agents

Jen-tse Huang, Jiaxu Zhou, Tailin Jin +6

Large language model-based multi-agent systems have shown great abilities across various tasks due to the collaboration of expert agents, each focusing on a specific domain. Howeve…