activity
20232026
most citedA Framework for Automated Measurement of Responsible AI Harms in Generative AI Applications

2 citations · 7 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

9 papers

cs.CL2026

ASSERT: A Measurement Pipeline for GenAI Audits

Riccardo Fogliato, Abhinav Palia, Xiawei Wang +11

Audits of generative AI (GenAI) systems often summarize behavior as a reported rate: how often the audited system complies with policy. Researchers and stakeholders use that rate t…

cs.CL2026

AI-Assisted Systematization for Evaluating GenAI Systems

Dhruv Agarwal, Emily Sheng, Chad Atalla +6

Evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems is challenging because many targets of evaluation are broad, contested concepts, such as "reasoning," "fairness," or "creativity." When the…

cs.CY2025

Understanding and Meeting Practitioner Needs When Measuring Representational Harms Caused by LLM-Based Systems

Emma Harvey, Emily Sheng, Su Lin Blodgett +4

The NLP research community has made publicly available numerous instruments for measuring representational harms caused by large language model (LLM)-based systems. These instrumen…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Taxonomizing Representational Harms using Speech Act Theory

Emily Corvi, Hannah Washington, Stefanie Reed +9

Representational harms are widely recognized among fairness-related harms caused by generative language systems. However, their definitions are commonly under-specified. We make a…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

Position: Evaluating Generative AI Systems Is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, A. Feder Cooper +17

The measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems lack sufficient scientific rigor, leading to what has been described as "a tangle of sloppy tests [and] a…

cs.CY2024

A Shared Standard for Valid Measurement of Generative AI Systems' Capabilities, Risks, and Impacts

Alexandra Chouldechova, Chad Atalla, Solon Barocas +11

The valid measurement of generative AI (GenAI) systems' capabilities, risks, and impacts forms the bedrock of our ability to evaluate these systems. We introduce a shared standard…

cs.CY2024★ 1 cited

Gaps Between Research and Practice When Measuring Representational Harms Caused by LLM-Based Systems

Emma Harvey, Emily Sheng, Su Lin Blodgett +4

To facilitate the measurement of representational harms caused by large language model (LLM)-based systems, the NLP research community has produced and made publicly available nume…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

Evaluating Generative AI Systems is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, Nicholas Pangakis +17

Across academia, industry, and government, there is an increasing awareness that the measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems are especially difficult…

cs.CL2023★ 2 cited

A Framework for Automated Measurement of Responsible AI Harms in Generative AI Applications

Ahmed Magooda, Alec Helyar, Kyle Jackson +14

We present a framework for the automated measurement of responsible AI (RAI) metrics for large language models (LLMs) and associated products and services. Our framework for automa…