activity
20232026
most citedCan Large Language Models Discern Evidence for Scientific Hypotheses? Case Studies in the Social Sciences

2 citations · 4 across the 12 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2026Show all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CY2026

Human-AI Collaboration for Estimating Scientific Replicability

Tatiana Chakravorti, Robert Fraleigh, Timothy Fritton +7

Determining whether published scientific findings can successfully be replicated is a long-standing challenge in the empirical sciences. Existing approaches for replicability asses…

cs.CL2026

Many Ways to Be Fake: Benchmarking Fake News Detection Under Strategy-Driven AI Generation

Xinyu Wang, Sai Koneru, Wenbo Zhang +3

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled the large-scale generation of highly fluent and deceptive news-like content. While prior work has often treated fake ne…

cs.CL2026

Context Selection for Hypothesis and Statistical Evidence Extraction from Full-Text Scientific Articles

Sai Koneru, Jian Wu, Sarah Rajtmajer

Extracting hypotheses and their supporting statistical evidence from full-text scientific articles is central to the synthesis of empirical findings, but remains difficult due to d…

cs.CL2026

Evaluating Evidence Grounding Under User Pressure in Instruction-Tuned Language Models

Sai Koneru, Elphin Joe, Christine Kirchhoff +2

In contested domains, instruction-tuned language models must balance user-alignment pressures against faithfulness to the in-context evidence. To evaluate this tension, we introduc…

cs.AI2026

ReplicatorBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Replicability in Social and Behavioral Sciences

Bang Nguyen, Dominik Soós, Qian Ma +8

The literature has witnessed an emerging interest in AI agents for automated assessment of scientific papers. Existing benchmarks focus primarily on the computational aspect of thi…