10 citations · 11 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
Categorical Emotions or Appraisals - Which Emotion Model Explains Argument Convincingness Better?
Lynn Greschner, Meike Bauer, Sabine Weber +1
The convincingness of an argument does not only depend on its structure (logos), the person who makes the argument (ethos), but also on the emotion that it causes in the recipient…
Emotionally Charged, Logically Blurred: AI-driven Emotional Framing Impairs Human Fallacy Detection
Yanran Chen, Lynn Greschner, Roman Klinger +2
Logical fallacies are common in public communication and can mislead audiences; fallacious arguments may still appear convincing despite lacking soundness, because convincingness i…
Trust Me, I Can Convince You: The Contextualized Argument Appraisal Framework
Lynn Greschner, Sabine Weber, Roman Klinger
Emotions that somebody develops based on an argument do not only depend on the argument itself - they are also influenced by a subjective evaluation of the argument's potential imp…
Feeling Machines: Ethics, Culture, and the Rise of Emotional AI
Vivek Chavan, Arsen Cenaj, Shuyuan Shen +21
This paper explores the growing presence of emotionally responsive artificial intelligence through a critical and interdisciplinary lens. Bringing together the voices of early-care…
Fearful Falcons and Angry Llamas: Emotion Category Annotations of Arguments by Humans and LLMs
Lynn Greschner, Roman Klinger
Arguments evoke emotions, influencing the effect of the argument itself. Not only the emotional intensity but also the category influence the argument's effects, for instance, the…
Which Demographics do LLMs Default to During Annotation?
Johannes Schäfer, Aidan Combs, Christopher Bagdon +9
Demographics and cultural background of annotators influence the labels they assign in text annotation -- for instance, an elderly woman might find it offensive to read a message a…