14 citations · 17 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities
Stephen Casper, Oskar Galeev, Yoshua Bengio +117
Frontier AI capabilities and autonomy are advancing rapidly. A growing number of real-world incidents make a trusted AI ecosystem essential to embracing AI with confidence. The 202…
The Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities
Yoshua Bengio, Tegan Maharaj, Luke Ong +84
Rapidly improving AI capabilities and autonomy hold significant promise of transformation, but are also driving vigorous debate on how to ensure that AI is safe, i.e., trustworthy,…
HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks
David Rein, Joel Becker, Amy Deng +19
To understand and predict the societal impacts of highly autonomous AI systems, we need benchmarks with grounding, i.e., metrics that directly connect AI performance to real-world…
DarkBench: Benchmarking Dark Patterns in Large Language Models
Esben Kran, Hieu Minh "Jord" Nguyen, Akash Kundu +3
We introduce DarkBench, a comprehensive benchmark for detecting dark design patterns--manipulative techniques that influence user behavior--in interactions with large language mode…
Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks
Thomas Kwa, Ben West, Joel Becker +23
Despite rapid progress on AI benchmarks, the real-world meaning of benchmark performance remains unclear. To quantify the capabilities of AI systems in terms of human capabilities,…
RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human experts
Hjalmar Wijk, Tao Lin, Joel Becker +20
Frontier AI safety policies highlight automation of AI research and development (R&D) by AI agents as an important capability to anticipate. However, there exist few evaluations fo…