most citedAssessing Judging Bias in Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical Study

1 citations · 1 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CL2026

Chain-of-Models: Cross-Model Auditing for Bias-Robust LLM Judges

Qian Wang, Zhanzhi Lou, Zhenheng Tang +2

LLMs increasingly serve as automated judges, but their judgments remain vulnerable to cognitive biases. Existing mitigations mostly rely on prompt-driven debiasing, which is brittl…

cs.LG2026

Meta-TTL: Meta-Learning Self-Improvement Policies for Language Agents

Zhanzhi Lou, Hui Chen, Yibo Li +2

Test-Time Learning (TTL) enables language agents to iteratively refine their performance through repeated interactions with the environment at inference time. At the core of TTL is…

cs.CY2026

Making Bias Non-Predictive: Training Robust LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning

Qian Wang, Xuandong Zhao, Zirui Zhang +4

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as reasoners and automated evaluators, yet they remain susceptible to cognitive biases -- often altering their reasoning when faced…

cs.CY2025

Towards Evaluting Fake Reasoning Bias in Language Models

Qian Wang, Zhenheng Tang, Zhanzhi Lou +3

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), evolved from standard Large Language Models (LLMs), are increasingly utilized as automated judges because of their explicit reasoning processes. Yet…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

Assessing Judging Bias in Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical Study

Qian Wang, Zhanzhi Lou, Zhenheng Tang +5

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) like DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI-o1 have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities, raising important questions about their biases in LLM-as-a-judge s…