activity
20242026
most citedThe Necessity of AI Audit Standards Boards

8 citations · 17 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.AI2026

Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reporting

Avijit Ghosh, Anka Reuel, Jenny Chim +45

AI evaluation results are produced at scale but reported inconsistently across leaderboards, model cards, benchmark papers, and company blogs. The cost is interpretive: readers can…

cs.CY2026

Prioritization of Risks from Artificial Intelligence: A Delphi Study of 272 International Experts

Alexander K. Saeri, Jess Graham, Michael Noetel +185

Artificial intelligence poses many risks, ranging from familiar present-day harms to unprecedented and potentially catastrophic ones. Effective risk management requires prioritizat…

cs.AI2026★ 8 cited

Agents of Chaos

Natalie Shapira, Chris Wendler, Avery Yen +35

We report an exploratory red-teaming study of autonomous language-model-powered agents deployed in a live laboratory environment with persistent memory, email accounts, Discord acc…

cs.AI2025★ 1 cited

Limits of Safe AI Deployment: Differentiating Oversight and Control

David Manheim, Aidan Homewood

Oversight and control, which we collectively call supervision, are often discussed as ways to ensure that AI systems are accountable, reliable, and able to fulfill governance and m…

cs.CY2024★ 8 cited

The Necessity of AI Audit Standards Boards

David Manheim, Sammy Martin, Mark Bailey +2

Auditing of AI systems is a promising way to understand and manage ethical problems and societal risks associated with contemporary AI systems, as well as some anticipated future r…