activity
20232026
most citedTranslating Legalese: Enhancing Public Understanding of Court Opinions with Legal Summarizers

8 citations · 12 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

11 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2025

Co-DETECT: Collaborative Discovery of Edge Cases in Text Classification

Chenfei Xiong, Jingwei Ni, Yu Fan +10

We introduce Co-DETECT (Collaborative Discovery of Edge cases in TExt ClassificaTion), a novel mixed-initiative annotation framework that integrates human expertise with automatic…

cs.CL2025

The Medium Is Not the Message: Deconfounding Document Embeddings via Linear Concept Erasure

Yu Fan, Yang Tian, Shauli Ravfogel +3

Embedding-based similarity metrics between text sequences can be influenced not just by the content dimensions we most care about, but can also be biased by spurious attributes lik…

cs.CL2025

Can Reasoning Help Large Language Models Capture Human Annotator Disagreement?

Jingwei Ni, Yu Fan, Vilém Zouhar +6

Variation in human annotation (i.e., disagreements) is common in NLP, often reflecting important information like task subjectivity and sample ambiguity. Modeling this variation is…

cs.CL2025

LEXam: Benchmarking Legal Reasoning on 340 Law Exams

Yu Fan, Jingwei Ni, Jakob Merane +14

Long-form legal reasoning remains a key challenge for large language models (LLMs) in spite of recent advances in test-time scaling. To address this, we introduce LEXam, a novel be…

cs.CL2025

Balancing Truthfulness and Informativeness with Uncertainty-Aware Instruction Fine-Tuning

Tianyi Wu, Jingwei Ni, Bryan Hooi +5

Instruction fine-tuning (IFT) can increase the informativeness of large language models (LLMs), but may reduce their truthfulness. This trade-off arises because IFT steers LLMs to…

cs.CL2024

Aligning Large Language Models with Diverse Political Viewpoints

Dominik Stammbach, Philine Widmer, Eunjung Cho +2

Large language models such as ChatGPT exhibit striking political biases. If users query them about political information, they often take a normative stance. To overcome this, we a…

cs.CL2024

AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotators

Jingwei Ni, Minjing Shi, Dominik Stammbach +3

With the rise of generative AI, automated fact-checking methods to combat misinformation are becoming more and more important. However, factual claim detection, the first step in a…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Towards Faithful and Robust LLM Specialists for Evidence-Based Question-Answering

Tobias Schimanski, Jingwei Ni, Mathias Kraus +2

Advances towards more faithful and traceable answers of Large Language Models (LLMs) are crucial for various research and practical endeavors. One avenue in reaching this goal is b…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

LePaRD: A Large-Scale Dataset of Judges Citing Precedents

Robert Mahari, Dominik Stammbach, Elliott Ash +1

We present the Legal Passage Retrieval Dataset LePaRD. LePaRD is a massive collection of U.S. federal judicial citations to precedent in context. The dataset aims to facilitate wor…

cs.CL2023★ 8 cited

Translating Legalese: Enhancing Public Understanding of Court Opinions with Legal Summarizers

Elliott Ash, Aniket Kesari, Suresh Naidu +2

Judicial opinions are written to be persuasive and could build public trust in court decisions, yet they can be difficult for non-experts to understand. We present a pipeline for u…

cs.CL2023

The Law and NLP: Bridging Disciplinary Disconnects

Robert Mahari, Dominik Stammbach, Elliott Ash +1

Legal practice is intrinsically rooted in the fabric of language, yet legal practitioners and scholars have been slow to adopt tools from natural language processing (NLP). At the…