activity
20222025
most citedExplainability in Process Outcome Prediction: Guidelines to Obtain Interpretable and Faithful Models

3 citations · 4 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.LG2025

Leveraging Machine Learning and Enhanced Parallelism Detection for BPMN Model Generation from Text

Phuong Nam Lê, Charlotte Schneider-Depré, Alexandre Goossens +3

Efficient planning, resource management, and consistent operations often rely on converting textual process documents into formal Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) models.…

cs.LG2025

Crafting Imperceptible On-Manifold Adversarial Attacks for Tabular Data

Zhipeng He, Alexander Stevens, Chun Ouyang +3

Adversarial attacks on tabular data present unique challenges due to the heterogeneous nature of mixed categorical and numerical features. Unlike images where pixel perturbations m…

cs.LG2024

Generating Realistic Adversarial Examples for Business Processes using Variational Autoencoders

Alexander Stevens, Jari Peeperkorn, Johannes De Smedt +1

In predictive process monitoring, predictive models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where input perturbations can lead to incorrect predictions. Unlike in computer vision, w…

cs.AI2024★ 1 cited

Generating Feasible and Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Outcome Prediction of Business Processes

Alexander Stevens, Chun Ouyang, Johannes De Smedt +1

In recent years, various machine and deep learning architectures have been successfully introduced to the field of predictive process analytics. Nevertheless, the inherent opacity…

cs.LG2022★ 3 cited

Explainability in Process Outcome Prediction: Guidelines to Obtain Interpretable and Faithful Models

Alexander Stevens, Johannes De Smedt

Although a recent shift has been made in the field of predictive process monitoring to use models from the explainable artificial intelligence field, the evaluation still occurs ma…