activity
20232025
most citedParting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planning

15 citations · 25 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

11 papers

cs.RO2025

Driving is a Game: Combining Planning and Prediction with Bayesian Iterative Best Response

Aron Distelzweig, Yiwei Wang, Faris Janjoš +5

Autonomous driving planning systems perform nearly perfectly in routine scenarios using lightweight, rule-based methods but still struggle in dense urban traffic, where lane change…

cs.RO2025

AGENTS-LLM: Augmentative GENeration of Challenging Traffic Scenarios with an Agentic LLM Framework

Yu Yao, Salil Bhatnagar, Markus Mazzola +5

Rare, yet critical, scenarios pose a significant challenge in testing and evaluating autonomous driving planners. Relying solely on real-world driving scenes requires collecting ma…

cs.RO2025

Pseudo-Simulation for Autonomous Driving

Wei Cao, Marcel Hallgarten, Tianyu Li +11

Existing evaluation paradigms for Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) face critical limitations. Real-world evaluation is often challenging due to safety concerns and a lack of reproducibili…

cs.RO2025

Learning Through Retrospection: Improving Trajectory Prediction for Automated Driving with Error Feedback

Steffen Hagedorn, Aron Distelzweig, Marcel Hallgarten +1

In automated driving, predicting trajectories of surrounding vehicles supports reasoning about scene dynamics and enables safe planning for the ego vehicle. However, existing model…

cs.CV2024

NAVSIM: Data-Driven Non-Reactive Autonomous Vehicle Simulation and Benchmarking

Daniel Dauner, Marcel Hallgarten, Tianyu Li +9

Benchmarking vision-based driving policies is challenging. On one hand, open-loop evaluation with real data is easy, but these results do not reflect closed-loop performance. On th…

cs.RO2024★ 1 cited

Can Vehicle Motion Planning Generalize to Realistic Long-tail Scenarios?

Marcel Hallgarten, Julian Zapata, Martin Stoll +2

Real-world autonomous driving systems must make safe decisions in the face of rare and diverse traffic scenarios. Current state-of-the-art planners are mostly evaluated on real-wor…

cs.RO2023★ 2 cited

Conditional Unscented Autoencoders for Trajectory Prediction

Faris Janjoš, Marcel Hallgarten, Anthony Knittel +3

The CVAE is one of the most widely-used models in trajectory prediction for AD. It captures the interplay between a driving context and its ground-truth future into a probabilistic…

cs.RO2023★ 6 cited

The Integration of Prediction and Planning in Deep Learning Automated Driving Systems: A Review

Steffen Hagedorn, Marcel Hallgarten, Martin Stoll +1

Automated driving has the potential to revolutionize personal, public, and freight mobility. Beside accurately perceiving the environment, automated vehicles must plan a safe, comf…

cs.RO2023★ 15 cited

Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planning

Daniel Dauner, Marcel Hallgarten, Andreas Geiger +1

The release of nuPlan marks a new era in vehicle motion planning research, offering the first large-scale real-world dataset and evaluation schemes requiring both precise short-ter…

cs.RO2023

Stay on Track: A Frenet Wrapper to Overcome Off-road Trajectories in Vehicle Motion Prediction

Marcel Hallgarten, Ismail Kisa, Martin Stoll +1

Predicting the future motion of observed vehicles is a crucial enabler for safe autonomous driving. The field of motion prediction has seen large progress recently with state-of-th…

cs.RO2023★ 1 cited

From Prediction to Planning With Goal Conditioned Lane Graph Traversals

Marcel Hallgarten, Martin Stoll, Andreas Zell

The field of motion prediction for automated driving has seen tremendous progress recently, bearing ever-more mighty neural network architectures. Leveraging these powerful models…