most citedAre Language Models Consequentialist or Deontological Moral Reasoners?

2 citations · 2 across the 7 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

Evaluating Cooperation in LLM Social Groups through Elected Leadership

Ryan Faulkner, Anushka Deshpande, David Guzman Piedrahita +2

Governing common-pool resources requires agents to develop enduring strategies through cooperation and self-governance to avoid collective failure. While foundation models have sho…

cs.CL2025

Robustness of Misinformation Classification Systems to Adversarial Examples Through BeamAttack

Arnisa Fazla, Lucas Krauter, David Guzman Piedrahita +1

We extend BeamAttack, an adversarial attack algorithm designed to evaluate the robustness of text classification systems through word-level modifications guided by beam search. Our…

cs.CL2025

Democratic or Authoritarian? Probing a New Dimension of Political Biases in Large Language Models

David Guzman Piedrahita, Irene Strauss, Bernhard Schölkopf +2

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into everyday life and information ecosystems, concerns about their implicit biases continue to persist. While prior…

cs.CL2025★ 2 cited

Are Language Models Consequentialist or Deontological Moral Reasoners?

Keenan Samway, Max Kleiman-Weiner, David Guzman Piedrahita +3

As AI systems increasingly navigate applications in healthcare, law, and governance, understanding how they handle ethically complex scenarios becomes critical. Previous work has m…

cs.CL2025

When Ethics and Payoffs Diverge: LLM Agents in Morally Charged Social Dilemmas

Steffen Backmann, David Guzman Piedrahita, Terry Jingchen Zhang +4

Recent advances in LLMs have enabled their use in complex agentic roles, involving decision-making with humans or other agents, making ethical alignment a critical concern. While p…