activity
20242026
most citedDo LLMs generate test oracles that capture the actual or the expected program behaviour?

2 citations · 3 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.SE2026

Boosting LLMs for Mutation Generation

Bo Wang, Ming Deng, Mingda Chen +5

LLM-based mutation testing is a promising testing technology, but existing approaches typically rely on a fixed set of mutations as few-shot examples or none at all. This can resul…

cs.AI2026

Towards a more efficient bias detection in financial language models

Firas Hadj Kacem, Ahmed Khanfir, Mike Papadakis

Bias in financial language models constitutes a major obstacle to their adoption in real-world applications. Detecting such bias is challenging, as it requires identifying inputs w…

cs.SE2026

One Model, Many Skills: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Multitask Code Analysis

Amal Akli, Maxime Cordy, Mike Papadakis +1

Large language models have recently surpassed specialized systems on code generation, yet their effectiveness on other code-analysis tasks remains less clear. At the same time, mul…

cs.SE20251 cited

YATE: The Role of Test Repair in LLM-Based Unit Test Generation

Michael Konstantinou, Renzo Degiovanni, Jie M. Zhang +2

Recent advances in automated test generation utilises language models to produce unit tests. While effective, language models tend to generate many incorrect tests with respect to…

cs.SE20242 cited

Do LLMs generate test oracles that capture the actual or the expected program behaviour?

Michael Konstantinou, Renzo Degiovanni, Mike Papadakis

Software testing is an essential part of the software development cycle to improve the code quality. Typically, a unit test consists of a test prefix and a test oracle which captur…