most citedMonitoring Robustness and Individual Fairness

3 citations · 4 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

cs.LO2025

Alignment Monitoring

Thomas A. Henzinger, Konstantin Kueffner, Vasu Singh +1

Formal verification provides assurances that a probabilistic system satisfies its specification--conditioned on the system model being aligned with reality. We propose alignment mo…

cs.AI2025

Algorithmic Fairness: A Runtime Perspective

Filip Cano, Thomas A. Henzinger, Konstantin Kueffner

Fairness in AI is traditionally studied as a static property evaluated once, over a fixed dataset. However, real-world AI systems operate sequentially, with outcomes and environmen…

cs.SC2025

Formal Verification of Neural Certificates Done Dynamically

Thomas A. Henzinger, Konstantin Kueffner, Emily Yu

Neural certificates have emerged as a powerful tool in cyber-physical systems control, providing witnesses of correctness. These certificates, such as barrier functions, often lear…

cs.LG2025

Monitoring of Static Fairness

Thomas A. Henzinger, Mahyar Karimi, Konstantin Kueffner +1

Machine-learned systems are in widespread use for making decisions about humans, and it is important that they are fair, i.e., not biased against individuals based on sensitive att…

cs.AI20253 cited

Monitoring Robustness and Individual Fairness

Ashutosh Gupta, Thomas A. Henzinger, Konstantin Kueffner +2

Input-output robustness appears in various different forms in the literature, such as robustness of AI models to adversarial or semantic perturbations and individual fairness of AI…

cs.AI20241 cited

Fairness Shields: Safeguarding against Biased Decision Makers

Filip Cano, Thomas A. Henzinger, Bettina Könighofer +2

As AI-based decision-makers increasingly influence human lives, it is a growing concern that their decisions are often unfair or biased with respect to people's sensitive attribute…