most citedCan AI Rely on the Systematicity of Truth? The Challenge of Modelling Normative Domains

5 citations · 7 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

cs.AI2026

A Polyphonic Conception of AI Understanding

Matthieu Queloz, Pierre Beckmann

When a doctor, a judge, or an engineer must decide whether to trust an AI model's output, they cannot avoid asking what the model understands. Purely mathematical or statistical de…

cs.AI2026

World Modeling in Transformers

Pierre Beckmann, Matthieu Queloz, Andre Freitas

Behavioral failures can make a transformer appear to lack a world model even when it has learned faithful representations of its environment. We demonstrate this in TaxiGPT, a tran…

cs.AI2026

Why We Care About Understanding: Competence through Predictive Compression

Matthieu Queloz, Pierre Beckmann

What is the relation between understanding and compression, and why does human understanding take such a heavily compressed form? Across information theory, machine learning, and A…

cs.AI2025★ 2 cited

Explainability Through Systematicity: The Hard Systematicity Challenge for Artificial Intelligence

Matthieu Queloz

This paper argues that explainability is only one facet of a broader ideal that shapes our expectations towards artificial intelligence (AI). Fundamentally, the issue is to what ex…

cs.CY2025★ 5 cited

Can AI Rely on the Systematicity of Truth? The Challenge of Modelling Normative Domains

Matthieu Queloz

A key assumption fuelling optimism about the progress of large language models (LLMs) in accurately and comprehensively modelling the world is that the truth is systematic: true st…

cs.CL2025

Mechanistic Indicators of Understanding in Large Language Models

Pierre Beckmann, Matthieu Queloz

Large language models (LLMs) are often portrayed as merely imitating linguistic patterns without genuine understanding. We argue that recent findings in mechanistic interpretabilit…