most citedMAEBE: Multi-Agent Emergent Behavior Framework

1 citations · 1 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

9 papers

cs.AI2026

A Fair Objective for Human-Empowerment-Preserving AI: Desiderata, Design, and Likely Behavioral Consequences

Jobst Heitzig, Ram Potham

This paper explores the idea of promoting well-being and safety in human-AI interactions by forcing AI agents explicitly to empower humans and to manage the power balance between h…

cs.AI2026

Attack Selection in Agentic AI Control Evaluations Meaningfully Decreases Safety

Catherine Ge-Wang, Tyler Crosse, Benjamin Hadad +3

An attacker that strategically chooses when to attack is much harder to catch than one that attacks indiscriminately. AI control is a safety framework for deploying capable but unt…

cs.AI2026

Think Fast: Estimating No-CoT Task-Completion Time Horizons of Frontier AI Models

Dewi Gould, Francis Rhys Ward, Anders Cairns Woodruff +18

Many efforts to ensure frontier AI models are safe rely on monitoring their chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. If models become able to perform sufficiently complex reasoning intern…

cs.CR2026

LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments

Tyler Tracy, Ram Potham, Nick Kuhn +31

We introduce LinuxArena, a control setting in which agents operate directly on live, multi-service production environments. LinuxArena contains 20 environments, 1,671 main tasks re…

cs.CR2026

An Independent Safety Evaluation of Kimi K2.5

Zheng-Xin Yong, Parv Mahajan, Andy Wang +12

Kimi K2.5 is an open-weight LLM that rivals closed models across coding, multimodal, and agentic benchmarks, but was released without an accompanying safety evaluation. In this wor…

cs.AI2025

Model-Based Soft Maximization of Suitable Metrics of Long-Term Human Power

Jobst Heitzig, Ram Potham

Power is a key concept in AI safety: power-seeking as an instrumental goal, sudden or gradual disempowerment of humans, power balance in human-AI interaction and international AI g…

cs.MA2025★ 1 cited

MAEBE: Multi-Agent Emergent Behavior Framework

Sinem Erisken, Timothy Gothard, Martin Leitgab +1

Traditional AI safety evaluations on isolated LLMs are insufficient as multi-agent AI ensembles become prevalent, introducing novel emergent risks. This paper introduces the Multi-…

cs.LG2025

Evaluating LLM Agent Adherence to Hierarchical Safety Principles: A Lightweight Benchmark for Probing Foundational Controllability Components

Ram Potham

Credible safety plans for advanced AI development require methods to verify agent behavior and detect potential control deficiencies early. A fundamental aspect is ensuring agents…

cs.AI2025

Corrigibility as a Singular Target: A Vision for Inherently Reliable Foundation Models

Ram Potham, Max Harms

Foundation models (FMs) face a critical safety challenge: as capabilities scale, instrumental convergence drives default trajectories toward loss of human control, potentially culm…