4 citations · 10 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for
3 papers · 1 filter
Facilitating Human-LLM Collaboration through Factuality Scores and Source Attributions
Hyo Jin Do, Rachel Ostrand, Justin D. Weisz +5
While humans increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs), they are susceptible to generating inaccurate or false information, also known as "hallucinations". Technical advanc…
The RealHumanEval: Evaluating Large Language Models' Abilities to Support Programmers
Hussein Mozannar, Valerie Chen, Mohammed Alsobay +7
Evaluation of large language models for code has primarily relied on static benchmarks, including HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021), or more recently using human preferences of LLM res…
Detectors for Safe and Reliable LLMs: Implementations, Uses, and Limitations
Swapnaja Achintalwar, Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Ateret Anaby-Tavor +35
Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to a variety of risks, from non-faithful output to biased and toxic generations. Due to several limiting factors surrounding LLMs (trai…