activity
20222026
most citedCounterfactual Prediction Under Outcome Measurement Error

10 citations · 15 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

11 papers

cs.CY2026

Bridging Predictions and Interventions: An Integrated Framework for Automated Decision-Systems

Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Lydia T. Liu, Angela Zhou +27

Automated decision systems (ADS) leverage predictions about individual future outcomes to inform consequential decision-making in organizational settings. Across various settings -…

cs.LG2025

Doubly-Robust LLM-as-a-Judge: Externally Valid Estimation with Imperfect Personas

Luke Guerdan, Justin Whitehouse, Kimberly Truong +2

As Generative AI (GenAI) systems see growing adoption, a key concern involves the external validity of evaluations, or the extent to which they generalize from lab-based to real-wo…

cs.HC2025

Measurement as Bricolage: Examining How Data Scientists Construct Target Variables for Predictive Modeling Tasks

Luke Guerdan, Devansh Saxena, Stevie Chancellor +2

Data scientists often formulate predictive modeling tasks involving fuzzy, hard-to-define concepts, such as the "authenticity" of student writing or the "healthcare need" of a pati…

cs.LG2025

Bridging Prediction and Intervention Problems in Social Systems

Lydia T. Liu, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Angela Zhou +32

Many automated decision systems (ADS) are designed to solve prediction problems -- where the goal is to learn patterns from a sample of the population and apply them to individuals…

cs.LG2025★ 2 cited

Validating LLM-as-a-Judge Systems under Rating Indeterminacy

Luke Guerdan, Solon Barocas, Kenneth Holstein +3

The LLM-as-a-judge paradigm, in which a judge LLM system replaces human raters in rating the outputs of other generative AI (GenAI) systems, plays a critical role in scaling and st…

cs.LG2024

A Framework for Evaluating LLMs Under Task Indeterminacy

Luke Guerdan, Hanna Wallach, Solon Barocas +1

Large language model (LLM) evaluations often assume there is a single correct response -- a gold label -- for each item in the evaluation corpus. However, some tasks can be ambiguo…

cs.LG2024

Predictive Performance Comparison of Decision Policies Under Confounding

Luke Guerdan, Amanda Coston, Kenneth Holstein +1

Predictive models are often introduced to decision-making tasks under the rationale that they improve performance over an existing decision-making policy. However, it is challengin…

cs.HC2023

Training Towards Critical Use: Learning to Situate AI Predictions Relative to Human Knowledge

Anna Kawakami, Luke Guerdan, Yanghuidi Cheng +6

A growing body of research has explored how to support humans in making better use of AI-based decision support, including via training and onboarding. Existing research has focuse…

cs.LG2023★ 10 cited

Counterfactual Prediction Under Outcome Measurement Error

Luke Guerdan, Amanda Coston, Kenneth Holstein +1

Across domains such as medicine, employment, and criminal justice, predictive models often target labels that imperfectly reflect the outcomes of interest to experts and policymake…

cs.CY2023★ 2 cited

Ground(less) Truth: A Causal Framework for Proxy Labels in Human-Algorithm Decision-Making

Luke Guerdan, Amanda Coston, Zhiwei Steven Wu +1

A growing literature on human-AI decision-making investigates strategies for combining human judgment with statistical models to improve decision-making. Research in this area ofte…

cs.HC2022★ 1 cited

Towards a Learner-Centered Explainable AI: Lessons from the learning sciences

Anna Kawakami, Luke Guerdan, Yang Cheng +8

In this short paper, we argue for a refocusing of XAI around human learning goals. Drawing upon approaches and theories from the learning sciences, we propose a framework for the l…