activity
20232026
most citedIdentifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox

6 citations · 6 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

9 papers

cs.SE2026

Precise Debugging Benchmark: Is Your Model Debugging or Regenerating?

Wang Bill Zhu, Miaosen Chai, Shangshang Wang +5

Unlike code completion, debugging requires localizing faults and applying targeted edits. We observe that frontier LLMs often regenerate correct but over-edited solutions during de…

cs.AI2026

Grounded Chess Reasoning in Language Models via Master Distillation

Zhenwei Tang, Qianfeng Wen, Seth Grief-Albert +4

Language models often lack grounded reasoning capabilities in specialized domains where training data is scarce but bespoke systems excel. We introduce a general framework for dist…

cs.SE2026

SWE-Bench Mobile: Can Large Language Model Agents Develop Industry-Level Mobile Applications?

Muxin Tian, Zhe Wang, Blair Yang +7

Can large language model agents develop industry-level mobile applications? We introduce \textbf{SWE-Bench Mobile}, a benchmark for evaluating coding agents on realistic software e…

cs.AI2025

LM Agents May Fail to Act on Their Own Risk Knowledge

Yuzhi Tang, Tianxiao Li, Elizabeth Li +3

Language model (LM) agents have demonstrated significant potential for automating real-world tasks, yet they pose a diverse array of potential, severe risks in safety-critical scen…

cs.SE2025

TypyBench: Evaluating LLM Type Inference for Untyped Python Repositories

Honghua Dong, Jiacheng Yang, Xun Deng +4

Type inference for dynamic languages like Python is a persistent challenge in software engineering. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in code understanding, the…

cs.AI2025

-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment

Victor Barres, Honghua Dong, Soham Ray +2

Existing benchmarks for conversational AI agents simulate single-control environments, where only the AI agent can use tools to interact with the world, while the user remains a pa…

cs.SE2024

Assessing Code Generation with Intermediate Languages

Xun Deng, Sicheng Zhong, Honghua Dong +4

Intermediate step methodologies like chain of thoughts (COT) have demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on code generation. This s…

cs.AI2024

APPL: A Prompt Programming Language for Harmonious Integration of Programs and Large Language Model Prompts

Honghua Dong, Qidong Su, Yubo Gao +5

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become increasingly capable of handling diverse tasks with the aid of well-crafted prompts and integration of external tools, but as task complexi…

cs.AI2023★ 6 cited

Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox

Yangjun Ruan, Honghua Dong, Andrew Wang +6

Recent advances in Language Model (LM) agents and tool use, exemplified by applications like ChatGPT Plugins, enable a rich set of capabilities but also amplify potential risks - s…