activity
20232026
most citedDo Large Language Models have Shared Weaknesses in Medical Question Answering?

1 citations · 1 across the 13 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

13 papers

cs.CL2026

FramingQA: Does the Question Shape the Answer? Measuring the Compositional Framing Effect

Hazel H. Kim, Andrew M. Bean, Guilherme Affonso Ferreira de Camargo +10

We introduce FramingQA, a benchmark that measures the model sensitivity to question framing across law, medicine, finance, and robotic simulations. Large language models (LLMs) oft…

cs.AI2026

Thomson: Continual Learning of Frontier Models for SovereignAI

Shengzhuang Chen, Jerrod Parker, Yejin Bang +23

The development of frontier models is commonly perceived to be the exclusive remit of a small number of heavily funded players, creating an information, economic and power asymmetr…

cs.AI2026

InsufficiencyBench: Evaluating LLM legal advice on underspecified user queries

Samuel J. Vincent, Daniel Calloway, Fangyi Yu +2

Legal AI systems are increasingly used to answer legal questions, yet existing benchmarks assume queries arrive fully specified. In practice, users omit facts that materially deter…

cs.AI2026

ContractScrub: A benchmark for final review of legal contracts

Yejin Bang, Kirsty Fielding, Brandan Oliver +3

Legal work, with its heavy reliance on processing large amounts of text, is often considered one of the domains most exposed to the use of LLMs. Contract ``scrubbing,'' the final r…

cs.HC2026

How sensitive do we want AI to be? Socio-communicative competencies of large language models in healthcare

Dorothee Amelung, Andrew M. Bean, Sabine C. Herpertz +4

Background. Effective clinical practice relies heavily on the socio-communicative skills of medical professionals. Large language models (LLMs) have been proposed for tasks such as…

cs.AI2026

Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Results

Jan Batzner, Sree Harsha Nelaturu, Damian Stachura +45

AI evaluations are widely used for testing and understanding progress. However, the diverse evaluators bring with them inconsistencies that challenge analysis and comparison. First…

cs.CY2026

Prioritization of Risks from Artificial Intelligence: A Delphi Study of 272 International Experts

Alexander K. Saeri, Jess Graham, Michael Noetel +185

Artificial intelligence poses many risks, ranging from familiar present-day harms to unprecedented and potentially catastrophic ones. Effective risk management requires prioritizat…

cs.AI2026

To Whom Do Language Models Align? Measuring Principal Hierarchies Under High-Stakes Competing Demands

Fangyi Yu, Nabeel Seedat, Jonathan Richard Schwarz +1

Language models deployed in high-stakes professional settings face conflicting demands from users, institutional authorities, and professional norms. How models act when these dema…

cs.AI2025

Scales++: Compute Efficient Evaluation Subset Selection with Cognitive Scales Embeddings

Andrew M. Bean, Nabeel Seedat, Shengzhuang Chen +1

The prohibitive cost of evaluating large language models (LLMs) on comprehensive benchmarks necessitates the creation of small yet representative data subsets (i.e., tiny benchmark…

cs.LG2025

LLMs Don't Know Their Own Decision Boundaries: The Unreliability of Self-Generated Counterfactual Explanations

Harry Mayne, Ryan Othniel Kearns, Yushi Yang +4

To collaborate effectively with humans, language models must be able to explain their decisions in natural language. We study a specific type of self-explanation: self-generated co…

cs.CL2025

LINGOLY-TOO: Disentangling Reasoning from Knowledge with Templatised Orthographic Obfuscation

Jude Khouja, Lingyi Yang, Karolina Korgul +6

Frontier language models demonstrate increasing ability at solving reasoning problems, but their performance is often inflated by circumventing reasoning and instead relying on the…

cs.CL2024

Evaluating Fine-Tuning Efficiency of Human-Inspired Learning Strategies in Medical Question Answering

Yushi Yang, Andrew M. Bean, Robert McCraith +1

Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) incurs considerable training costs, driving the need for data-efficient training with optimised data ordering. Human-inspired strategies of…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

Do Large Language Models have Shared Weaknesses in Medical Question Answering?

Andrew M. Bean, Karolina Korgul, Felix Krones +2

Large language models (LLMs) have made rapid improvement on medical benchmarks, but their unreliability remains a persistent challenge for safe real-world uses. To design for the u…