most citedQuality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models vs Peer Patients for Interpreting Lab Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study

56 citations · 56 across the 2 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.AI2025

Evaluation of Causal Reasoning for Large Language Models in Contextualized Clinical Scenarios of Laboratory Test Interpretation

Balu Bhasuran, Mattia Prosperi, Karim Hanna +3

This study evaluates causal reasoning in large language models (LLMs) using 99 clinically grounded laboratory test scenarios aligned with Pearl's Ladder of Causation: association,…

cs.LG2025

HARDMath2: A Benchmark for Applied Mathematics Built by Students as Part of a Graduate Class

James V. Roggeveen, Erik Y. Wang, Will Flintoft +42

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress in mathematical problem-solving, but evaluation has largely focused on problems that have exact analytical solutions or…

cs.CL2024

Evaluating the Impact of Lab Test Results on Large Language Models Generated Differential Diagnoses from Clinical Case Vignettes

Balu Bhasuran, Qiao Jin, Yuzhang Xie +6

Differential diagnosis is crucial for medicine as it helps healthcare providers systematically distinguish between conditions that share similar symptoms. This study assesses the i…

cs.CL2024

AgentMD: Empowering Language Agents for Risk Prediction with Large-Scale Clinical Tool Learning

Qiao Jin, Zhizheng Wang, Yifan Yang +8

Clinical calculators play a vital role in healthcare by offering accurate evidence-based predictions for various purposes such as prognosis. Nevertheless, their widespread utilizat…

cs.CL2024★ 56 cited

Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models vs Peer Patients for Interpreting Lab Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study

Zhe He, Balu Bhasuran, Qiao Jin +6

Lab results are often confusing and hard to understand. Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have opened a promising avenue for patients to get their questions answered. We…