most citedAstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suite

1 citations · 1 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.HC2026

Asterism: Exploring and Synthesizing Scattered Observations into Literature-Grounded Hypotheses and Theories

Joseph Chee Chang, Michael D'Arcy, Amy X. Zhang +15

A theory draws many independent observations into one framework with novel hypotheses. A researcher building such a theory must synthesize observations scattered across many papers…

cs.CL2026

Old Ideas, Novel Problems: The Instability of LLM-Based Novelty Evaluation

Noy Sternlicht, Simra Shahid, Peter Jansen +3

AI-based ideation systems are often evaluated on the novelty of their ideas, and that judgment is increasingly delegated to large language models. Such judges are typically built a…

cs.CL2026

Generating Literature-Driven Scientific Theories at Scale

Peter Jansen, Peter Clark, Doug Downey +1

Contemporary automated scientific discovery has focused on agents for generating scientific experiments, while systems that perform higher-level scientific activities such as theor…

cs.AI2025★ 1 cited

AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suite

Jonathan Bragg, Mike D'Arcy, Nishant Balepur +36

AI agents hold the potential to revolutionize scientific productivity by automating literature reviews, replicating experiments, analyzing data, and even proposing new directions o…

cs.AI2025

HARPA: A Testability-Driven, Literature-Grounded Framework for Research Ideation

Rosni Vasu, Peter Jansen, Pao Siangliulue +4

While there has been a surge of interest in automated scientific discovery (ASD), especially with the emergence of LLMs, it remains challenging for tools to generate hypotheses tha…