activity
20232026
most citedInterpretable and Fair Mechanisms for Abstaining Classifiers

2 citations · 2 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

9 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2026

A CaLLM Judge is a Better Judge: Mitigating Bias in LLM-as-a-judge

Cesare Barbera, Luca Stradiotti, Lorenzo Cascioli +6

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges to predict which of two candidate answers a human evaluator would prefer, providing a scalable alternative when human e…

cs.LG2026

Should I stay or should I show? Learning to selectively disclose information

Carlotta Giacchetta, Alessando Bogani, Cesare Barbera +4

In many high-stakes settings, human decision-makers can acquire support information before making a decision. However, acquiring information is costly, and disclosure may fail to i…

cs.LG2026

Divide et Calibra: Multiclass Local Calibration via Vector Quantization

Cesare Barbera, Lorenzo Perini, Giovanni De Toni +2

Accurate and well-calibrated Machine Learning (ML) models are mandatory in high-stakes settings, yet effective multiclass calibration remains challenging: global approaches assume…

cs.LG2026

Concise and Logically Consistent Conformal Sets for Neuro-Symbolic Concept-Based Models

Samuele Bortolotti, Emanuele Marconato, Andrea Pugnana +2

Neuro-Symbolic Concept-based Models (NeSy-CBMs) are a family of architectures that integrate neural networks with symbolic reasoning for enhanced reliability in high-stakes applica…

cs.LG2025

To Ask or Not to Ask: Learning to Require Human Feedback

Andrea Pugnana, Giovanni De Toni, Cesare Barbera +3

Developing decision-support systems that complement human performance in classification tasks remains an open challenge. A popular approach, Learning to Defer (LtD), allows a Machi…

cs.LG2025

Multiclass Local Calibration with the Jensen-Shannon Distance

Cesare Barbera, Lorenzo Perini, Giovanni De Toni +2

Developing trustworthy Machine Learning (ML) models requires their predicted probabilities to be well-calibrated, meaning they should reflect true-class frequencies. Among calibrat…

cs.LG2025★ 2 cited

Interpretable and Fair Mechanisms for Abstaining Classifiers

Daphne Lenders, Andrea Pugnana, Roberto Pellungrini +3

Abstaining classifiers have the option to refrain from providing a prediction for instances that are difficult to classify. The abstention mechanism is designed to trade off the cl…

cs.LG2025

Deferring Concept Bottleneck Models: Learning to Defer Interventions to Inaccurate Experts

Andrea Pugnana, Riccardo Massidda, Francesco Giannini +6

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) are machine learning models that improve interpretability by grounding their predictions on human-understandable concepts, allowing for targeted in…

cs.LG2023

Model Agnostic Explainable Selective Regression via Uncertainty Estimation

Andrea Pugnana, Carlos Mougan, Dan Saattrup Nielsen

With the wide adoption of machine learning techniques, requirements have evolved beyond sheer high performance, often requiring models to be trustworthy. A common approach to incre…