1 citations · 2 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
Characterizing Quantum Error Correction Performance of Radiation-induced Errors
Paul G. Baity, Anuj K. Nayak, Lav R. Varshney +4
Radiation impacts are a current challenge with computing on superconducting-based quantum devices because they can lead to widespread correlated errors across the device. Such erro…
The foundational value of quantum computing for classical fluids
Sauro Succi, Claudio Sanavio, Peter Love
Quantum algorithms for classical physics problems expose new patterns of quantum information flow as compared to the many-body Schrödinger equation. As a result, besides their pote…
Roadblocks and Opportunities in Quantum Algorithms -- Insights from the National Quantum Initiative Joint Algorithms Workshop, May 20--22, 2024
Eliot Kapit, Peter Love, Jeffrey Larson +6
The National Quantum Initiative Joint Algorithms Workshop brought together researchers across academia, national laboratories, and industry to assess the current landscape of quant…
Entanglement and magic on the light-front
Sam Alterman, Peter J. Love
In the light-front (LF) formulation of quantum field theory (QFT), physics is formulated from the perspective of a massless observer necessarily traveling at the speed of light. Th…
Bayesian rational agents in iterated quantum games
John B. DeBrota, Peter J. Love
We apply a Bayesian agent-based framework inspired by QBism to iterations of two quantum games, the CHSH game and the quantum prisoners' dilemma. In each two-player game, players h…
Simulating Scattering of Composite Particles
Michael Kreshchuk, James P. Vary, Peter J. Love
We develop a non-perturbative approach to simulating scattering on classical and quantum computers, in which the initial and final states contain a fixed number of composite partic…