1 citations · 1 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
4 papers · 1 filter
Can LLMs Really Understand Item Difficulty Levels? Implications for Automated Item Generation Using LLMs
Xinyi Wang, Hong Jiao, Ming Li +4
The estimation of item difficulty plays a key role in both formative assessment and large-scale high-stakes summative assessments. This study explores how large language models (LL…
Automated Alignment of Math Items to Content Standards in Large-Scale Assessments Using Language Models
Qingshu Xu, Hong Jiao, Tianyi Zhou +4
Accurate alignment of items to content standards is critical for valid score interpretation in large-scale assessments. This study evaluates three automated paradigms for aligning…
Text-Based Approaches to Item Alignment to Content Standards in Large-Scale Reading & Writing Tests
Yanbin Fu, Hong Jiao, Tianyi Zhou +5
Aligning test items to content standards is a critical step in test development to collect validity evidence based on content. Item alignment has typically been conducted by human…
Text-Based Approaches to Item Difficulty Modeling in Large-Scale Assessments: A Systematic Review
Sydney Peters, Nan Zhang, Hong Jiao +3
Item difficulty plays a crucial role in test performance, interpretability of scores, and equity for all test-takers, especially in large-scale assessments. Traditional approaches…