1 citations · 1 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for
4 papers
Automated Alignment of Math Items to Content Standards in Large-Scale Assessments Using Language Models
Qingshu Xu, Hong Jiao, Tianyi Zhou +4
Accurate alignment of items to content standards is critical for valid score interpretation in large-scale assessments. This study evaluates three automated paradigms for aligning…
Text-Based Approaches to Item Alignment to Content Standards in Large-Scale Reading & Writing Tests
Yanbin Fu, Hong Jiao, Tianyi Zhou +5
Aligning test items to content standards is a critical step in test development to collect validity evidence based on content. Item alignment has typically been conducted by human…
Text-Based Approaches to Item Difficulty Modeling in Large-Scale Assessments: A Systematic Review
Sydney Peters, Nan Zhang, Hong Jiao +3
Item difficulty plays a crucial role in test performance, interpretability of scores, and equity for all test-takers, especially in large-scale assessments. Traditional approaches…
Understanding the Thinking Process of Reasoning Models: A Perspective from Schoenfeld's Episode Theory
Ming Li, Nan Zhang, Chenrui Fan +6
While Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) generate extensive chain-of-thought reasoning, we lack a principled framework for understanding how these thoughts are structured. In this paper…