5 citations · 9 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
MLCommons Jailbreak Benchmark v1.0
Carsten Maple, Cagatay Yucel, Isaac Holeman +33
Modern AI systems are designed to refuse hazardous requests. A jailbreak is a prompt crafted to bypass those safeguards and elicit outputs that the system would normally refuse to…
Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability
Alicia Parrish, Rajat Shinde, Sanket Badhe +57
Current AI safety evaluation and benchmarking frameworks predominantly rely on Western-centric culture-agnostic defaults that mask critical regional laws, socio-linguistic nuances,…
Risk Management for Mitigating Benchmark Failure Modes: BenchRisk
Sean McGregor, Victor Lu, Vassil Tashev +8
Large language model (LLM) benchmarks inform LLM use decisions (e.g., "is this LLM safe to deploy for my use case and context?"). However, benchmarks may be rendered unreliable by…
AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons
Shaona Ghosh, Heather Frase, Adina Williams +99
The rapid advancement and deployment of AI systems have created an urgent need for standard safety-evaluation frameworks. This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehen…
Introducing v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark from MLCommons
Bertie Vidgen, Adarsh Agrawal, Ahmed M. Ahmed +97
This paper introduces v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark, which has been created by the MLCommons AI Safety Working Group. The AI Safety Benchmark has been designed to assess the safe…