activity
20242026
most citedSelf-Rewarding Language Models

10 citations · 24 across the 16 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

18 papers

cs.AI2026

Autodata: An agentic data scientist to create high quality synthetic data

Ilia Kulikov, Chenxi Whitehouse, Tianhao Wu +12

We introduce Autodata, a general method that enables AI agents to act as data scientists who build high quality training and evaluation data. We show how to train (meta-optimize) s…

cs.AI2026

Reasoning over mathematical objects: on-policy reward modeling and test time aggregation

Pranjal Aggarwal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Seungone Kim +18

The ability to precisely derive mathematical objects is a core requirement for downstream STEM applications, including mathematics, physics, and chemistry, where reasoning must cul…

cs.CL2025

SPICE: Self-Play In Corpus Environments Improves Reasoning

Bo Liu, Chuanyang Jin, Seungone Kim +7

Self-improving systems require environmental interaction for continuous adaptation. We introduce SPICE (Self-Play In Corpus Environments), a reinforcement learning framework where…

cs.CL2025

RESTRAIN: From Spurious Votes to Signals -- Self-Driven RL with Self-Penalization

Zhaoning Yu, Will Su, Leitian Tao +9

Reinforcement learning with human-annotated data has boosted chain-of-thought reasoning in large reasoning models, but these gains come at high costs in labeled data while falterin…

cs.AI2025

StepWiser: Stepwise Generative Judges for Wiser Reasoning

Wei Xiong, Wenting Zhao, Weizhe Yuan +4

As models increasingly leverage multi-step reasoning strategies to solve complex problems, supervising the logical validity of these intermediate steps has become a critical resear…

cs.CL2025

NaturalThoughts: Selecting and Distilling Reasoning Traces for General Reasoning Tasks

Yang Li, Youssef Emad, Karthik Padthe +8

Recent work has shown that distilling reasoning traces from a larger teacher model via supervised finetuning outperforms reinforcement learning with the smaller student model alone…

cs.AI2025

CoT-Self-Instruct: Building high-quality synthetic prompts for reasoning and non-reasoning tasks

Ping Yu, Jack Lanchantin, Tianlu Wang +6

We propose CoT-Self-Instruct, a synthetic data generation method that instructs LLMs to first reason and plan via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) based on given seed tasks, and then generat…

cs.CL2025

Bridging Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning for LLMs

Jack Lanchantin, Angelica Chen, Janice Lan +9

We investigate the effectiveness of reinforcement learning methods for finetuning large language models when transitioning from offline to semi-online to fully online regimes for b…

cs.CL2025

R.I.P.: Better Models by Survival of the Fittest Prompts

Ping Yu, Weizhe Yuan, Olga Golovneva +4

Training data quality is one of the most important drivers of final model quality. In this work, we introduce a method for evaluating data integrity based on the assumption that lo…

stat.ML2025

An Overview of Large Language Models for Statisticians

Wenlong Ji, Weizhe Yuan, Emily Getzen +7

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative tools in artificial intelligence (AI), exhibiting remarkable capabilities across diverse tasks such as text generation,…

cs.CL2025

NaturalReasoning: Reasoning in the Wild with 2.8M Challenging Questions

Weizhe Yuan, Jane Yu, Song Jiang +8

Scaling reasoning capabilities beyond traditional domains such as math and coding is hindered by the lack of diverse and high-quality questions. To overcome this limitation, we int…

cs.CL2024

Self-Consistency Preference Optimization

Archiki Prasad, Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang +6

Self-alignment, whereby models learn to improve themselves without human annotation, is a rapidly growing research area. However, existing techniques often fail to improve complex…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

Thinking LLMs: General Instruction Following with Thought Generation

Tianhao Wu, Janice Lan, Weizhe Yuan +3

LLMs are typically trained to answer user questions or follow instructions similarly to how human experts respond. However, in the standard alignment framework they lack the basic…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

Self-Taught Evaluators

Tianlu Wang, Ilia Kulikov, Olga Golovneva +7

Model-based evaluation is at the heart of successful model development -- as a reward model for training, and as a replacement for human evaluation. To train such evaluators, the s…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge

Tianhao Wu, Weizhe Yuan, Olga Golovneva +5

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly surpassing human knowledge in many domains. While improving these models traditionally relies on costly human data, recent self-rewarding m…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Following Length Constraints in Instructions

Weizhe Yuan, Ilia Kulikov, Ping Yu +4

Aligned instruction following models can better fulfill user requests than their unaligned counterparts. However, it has been shown that there is a length bias in evaluation of suc…

cs.CL2024★ 4 cited

Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimization

Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Weizhe Yuan, Kyunghyun Cho +3

Iterative preference optimization methods have recently been shown to perform well for general instruction tuning tasks, but typically make little improvement on reasoning tasks (Y…

cs.CL2024★ 10 cited

Self-Rewarding Language Models

Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho +4

We posit that to achieve superhuman agents, future models require superhuman feedback in order to provide an adequate training signal. Current approaches commonly train reward mode…