activity
20232026
most citedChatGPT-4 Outperforms Experts and Crowd Workers in Annotating Political Twitter Messages with Zero-Shot Learning

161 citations · 235 across the 16 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

18 papers

cs.SI2026

From Caricature to Collective Artifact: How Persona Construction Drives Polarization in Generative Social Simulations

Dimitris Michailidis, Petter Törnberg, Fernando P. Santos

Generative Social Simulation (GSS) leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to create sophisticated personas that define agents with demographics, emotions, and political opinions. W…

cs.CY2026

Meeting the Coming Wave: The Emerging Politics of AI and Work across 33 Parliaments

Juliana Chueri, Petter Törnberg

A new politics of artificial intelligence and work is taking shape across party systems, but comparative politics has yet to map it. Using 1,514,950 parliamentary speeches from 33…

cs.CY2026

Political Sorting Can Drive AI Models Apart Through User Feedback

Petter Törnberg, Michael Heseltine, Nicolò Pagan +3

Large language models are rapidly becoming an important source of political information. This raises a fundamental question: will AI systems support a shared basis for political kn…

cs.SI2026

The Politics Attention Makes: Platform Media Logic and the Mediatization of Politics

Petter Törnberg

Empirical research on social media and politics has primarily treated platforms as distributive systems that expose users to particular messages. The mediatization literature, howe…

cs.AI2026

Political Bias Audits of LLMs Capture Sycophancy to the Inferred Auditor

Petter Törnberg, Michelle Schimmel

Large language models (LLMs) are commonly evaluated for political bias based on their responses to fixed questionnaires, which typically place frontier models on the political left…

cs.SI2026

Polarization by Default: Auditing Recommendation Bias in LLM-Based Content Curation

Nicolò Pagan, Christopher Barrie, Chris Andrew Bail +1

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed to curate and rank human-created content, yet the nature and structure of their biases in these tasks remains poorly understo…

cs.CL2026

Large Language Models Reproduce Racial Stereotypes When Used for Text Annotation

Petter Törnberg

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for automated text annotation in tasks ranging from academic research to content moderation and hiring. Across 19 LLMs and two ex…

cs.CY2025

Shifts in U.S. Social Media Use, 2020-2024: Decline, Fragmentation, and Enduring Polarization

Petter Törnberg

Using nationally representative data from the 2020 and 2024 American National Election Studies (ANES), this paper traces how the U.S. social media landscape has shifted across plat…

cs.SI2025

Online Homogeneity Can Emerge Without Filtering Algorithms or Homophily Preferences

Petter Törnberg

Ideologically homogeneous online environments - often described as "echo chambers" or "filter bubbles" - are widely seen as drivers of polarization, radicalization, and misinformat…

cs.SI2025★ 1 cited

Can We Fix Social Media? Testing Prosocial Interventions using Generative Social Simulation

Maik Larooij, Petter Törnberg

Social media platforms have been widely linked to societal harms, including rising polarization and the erosion of constructive debate. Can these problems be mitigated through pros…

cs.CL2025

Measuring Negative Campaigning across Languages with Large Language Models: A Study of 18 Million Tweets in 19 Countries

Victor Hartman, Petter Törnberg

Negative campaigning is a defining feature of electoral competition, yet comparative research on its drivers has remained limited by the high cost and limited scalability of existi…

cs.CL2025

Elite political incivility is rising across democracies

Petter Törnberg, Juliana Chueri

Is political incivility rising across democracies - and if so, why? Analysing approximately 13.8 million tweets from parliamentarians in 26 countries with a validated large languag…

cs.CL2024★ 6 cited

Prompt Stability Scoring for Text Annotation with Large Language Models

Christopher Barrie, Elli Palaiologou, Petter Törnberg

Researchers are increasingly using language models (LMs) for text annotation. These approaches rely only on a prompt telling the model to return a given output according to a set o…

cs.CL2024★ 23 cited

Best Practices for Text Annotation with Large Language Models

Petter Törnberg

Large Language Models (LLMs) have ushered in a new era of text annotation, as their ease-of-use, high accuracy, and relatively low costs have meant that their use has exploded in r…

cs.SI2023★ 7 cited

Toxic Bias: Perspective API Misreads German as More Toxic

Gianluca Nogara, Francesco Pierri, Stefano Cresci +3

Proprietary public APIs play a crucial and growing role as research tools among social scientists. Among such APIs, Google's machine learning-based Perspective API is extensively u…

cs.SI2023★ 18 cited

Simulating Social Media Using Large Language Models to Evaluate Alternative News Feed Algorithms

Petter Törnberg, Diliara Valeeva, Justus Uitermark +1

Social media is often criticized for amplifying toxic discourse and discouraging constructive conversations. But designing social media platforms to promote better conversations is…

cs.CL2023★ 19 cited

How to use LLMs for Text Analysis

Petter Törnberg

This guide introduces Large Language Models (LLM) as a highly versatile text analysis method within the social sciences. As LLMs are easy-to-use, cheap, fast, and applicable on a b…

cs.CL2023★ 161 cited

ChatGPT-4 Outperforms Experts and Crowd Workers in Annotating Political Twitter Messages with Zero-Shot Learning

Petter Törnberg

This paper assesses the accuracy, reliability and bias of the Large Language Model (LLM) ChatGPT-4 on the text analysis task of classifying the political affiliation of a Twitter p…