activity
20232026
most citedAgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents

5 citations · 13 across the 17 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

18 papers

cs.CL2026

CLExEval: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Qualitative Evaluation of LLM Clinical Reasoning

Ajmal M., Abin Roy, Afthab Salam Kanniyan +4

Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong results on many medical benchmarks, but their clinical reasoning remains difficult to evaluate reliably. A central risk is an evaluation…

cs.AI2026

Rethinking Uncertainty Evaluation in Large Language Models

Krish Matta, Atharv Naphade, Andy Zou

Calibration is the primary criterion for evaluating LLM confidence, but it is insufficient: it admits trivially incoherent estimators, depends on the evaluation distribution, and d…

cs.CY2026

Muse Spark Safety & Preparedness Report

Cristina Menghini, Peter Ney, Hamza Kwisaba +117

Muse Spark is the latest large language model developed by Meta. In this report, we first present evaluations for catastrophic risk domains under Meta's Advanced AI Scaling Framewo…

cs.CL2026

TLPO: Token-Level Policy Optimization for Mitigating Language Confusion in Large Language Models

Jinho Choo, JunSeung Lee, Jimyeong Kim +3

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong multilingual capabilities, yet often fail to consistently generate responses in the intended language, exhibiting a phenomenon known…

cs.CL2026

On Safety Risks in Experience-Driven Self-Evolving Agents

Weixiang Zhao, Yichen Zhang, Yingshuo Wang +8

Experience-driven self-evolution has emerged as a promising paradigm for improving the autonomy of large language model agents, yet its reliance on self-curated experience introduc…

cs.CR2026

How Vulnerable Are AI Agents to Indirect Prompt Injections? Insights from a Large-Scale Public Competition

Mateusz Dziemian, Maxwell Lin, Xiaohan Fu +28

LLM based agents are increasingly deployed in high stakes settings where they process external data sources such as emails, documents, and code repositories. This creates exposure…

cs.AI2025

Comparing AI Agents to Cybersecurity Professionals in Real-World Penetration Testing

Justin W. Lin, Eliot Krzysztof Jones, Donovan Julian Jasper +10

We present the first comprehensive evaluation of AI agents against human cybersecurity professionals in a live enterprise environment. We evaluate ten cybersecurity professionals a…

cs.CR2025

SIRAJ: Diverse and Efficient Red-Teaming for LLM Agents via Distilled Structured Reasoning

Kaiwen Zhou, Ahmed Elgohary, A S M Iftekhar +1

The ability of LLM agents to plan and invoke tools exposes them to new safety risks, making a comprehensive red-teaming system crucial for discovering vulnerabilities and ensuring…

cs.AI2025★ 3 cited

A Definition of AGI

Dan Hendrycks, Dawn Song, Christian Szegedy +30

The lack of a concrete definition for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) obscures the gap between today's specialized AI and human-level cognition. This paper introduces a quant…

cs.CL2025

D-REX: A Benchmark for Detecting Deceptive Reasoning in Large Language Models

Satyapriya Krishna, Andy Zou, Rahul Gupta +6

The safety and alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) are critical for their responsible deployment. Current evaluation methods predominantly focus on identifying and preventing…

cs.LG2025

Evaluating Language Model Reasoning about Confidential Information

Dylan Sam, Alexander Robey, Andy Zou +2

As language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in high-stakes settings, ensuring that they reliably follow user-defined rules has become a critical safety concer…

cs.RO2025

Adversarial Attacks on Robotic Vision Language Action Models

Eliot Krzysztof Jones, Alexander Robey, Andy Zou +5

The emergence of vision-language-action models (VLAs) for end-to-end control is reshaping the field of robotics by enabling the fusion of multimodal sensory inputs at the billion-p…

cs.CV2025

Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Black-Box Vision-Language Models

Kai Hu, Weichen Yu, Li Zhang +5

Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs) are increasingly deployed to offer advanced capabilities on inputs comprising both text and images. While prior research has shown that adversa…

cs.LG2025

Safety Pretraining: Toward the Next Generation of Safe AI

Pratyush Maini, Sachin Goyal, Dylan Sam +7

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings, the risk of generating harmful or toxic content remains a central challenge. Post-hoc alignment m…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspective

Yue Huang, Chujie Gao, Siyuan Wu +63

Generative Foundation Models (GenFMs) have emerged as transformative tools. However, their widespread adoption raises critical concerns regarding trustworthiness across dimensions.…

cs.LG2024★ 5 cited

AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents

Maksym Andriushchenko, Alexandra Souly, Mateusz Dziemian +11

The robustness of LLMs to jailbreak attacks, where users design prompts to circumvent safety measures and misuse model capabilities, has been studied primarily for LLMs acting as s…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboards

Norah Alzahrani, Hisham Abdullah Alyahya, Yazeed Alnumay +9

Large Language Model (LLM) leaderboards based on benchmark rankings are regularly used to guide practitioners in model selection. Often, the published leaderboard rankings are take…

cs.CL2023★ 2 cited

MorphPiece : A Linguistic Tokenizer for Large Language Models

Haris Jabbar

Tokenization is a critical part of modern NLP pipelines. However, contemporary tokenizers for Large Language Models are based on statistical analysis of text corpora, without much…