activity
20242026
most citedOpen RL Benchmark: Comprehensive Tracked Experiments for Reinforcement Learning

3 citations · 3 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

12 papers

cs.AI2026

Character Training for Risk-Averse Agents

Arav Dhoot, Punya Syon Pandey, Jamie Johnson +3

Risk aversion in resources could prevent misaligned AI agents from causing catastrophic harm. Misaligned but risk-averse agents would tend to favor safer strategies like making dea…

cs.AI2026

Don't Inoculate Everything: Stratified Inoculation Prompting Narrows Backdoor Triggers and Preserves Desired Traits

Kajetan Dymkiewicz, Tim Farrelly, Adam Práda +8

Supervised fine-tuning can teach language models undesired behaviours alongside desired ones. Inoculation prompting (IP) aims to limit unwanted generalisation by requesting the und…

cs.CL2026

Stress-testing Alignment Midtraining

Sid Baines, Jonathan Bostock, Maria Angelica Martinez +3

When aligning frontier models through post-training techniques, it is not possible to directly demonstrate all of the behaviours we want a model to exhibit in all possible deployme…

cs.AI2026

Inoculation Adapters: Improved Selective Generalization of Capabilities with Fewer Surprising Backdoors

Maxime Riché, Daniel Tan, Vili Kohonen +1

Inoculation prompting is a selective-generalization technique used against Emergent Misalignment. We introduce inoculation adapters (IA), a family of methods that similarly reduce…

cs.LG2026

Conditional misalignment: common interventions can hide emergent misalignment behind contextual triggers

Jan Dubiński, Jan Betley, Anna Sztyber-Betley +2

Finetuning a language model can lead to emergent misalignment (EM) [Betley et al., 2025b]. Models trained on a narrow distribution of misaligned behavior generalize to more egregio…

cs.CL2025

Inoculation Prompting: Eliciting traits from LLMs during training can suppress them at test-time

Daniel Tan, Anders Woodruff, Niels Warncke +4

Language model finetuning often results in learning undesirable traits in combination with desired ones. To address this, we propose inoculation prompting: modifying finetuning dat…

cs.AI2025

Spilling the Beans: Teaching LLMs to Self-Report Their Hidden Objectives

Chloe Li, Mary Phuong, Daniel Tan

As AI systems become more capable of complex agentic tasks, they also become more capable of pursuing undesirable objectives and causing harm. Previous work has attempted to catch…

cs.CR2025

LISA Technical Report: An Agentic Framework for Smart Contract Auditing

Izaiah Sun, Daniel Tan, Andy Deng

We present LISA, an agentic smart contract vulnerability detection framework that combines rule-based and logic-based methods to address a broad spectrum of vulnerabilities in smar…

cs.CR2025

Emergent misalignment as prompt sensitivity: A research note

Tim Wyse, Twm Stone, Anna Soligo +1

Betley et al. (2025) find that language models finetuned on insecure code become emergently misaligned (EM), giving misaligned responses in broad settings very different from those…

cs.LG2025

Taxonomy, Opportunities, and Challenges of Representation Engineering for Large Language Models

Jan Wehner, Sahar Abdelnabi, Daniel Tan +2

Representation Engineering (RepE) is a novel paradigm for controlling the behavior of LLMs. Unlike traditional approaches that modify inputs or fine-tune the model, RepE directly m…

cs.LG2024

Analyzing the Generalization and Reliability of Steering Vectors

Daniel Tan, David Chanin, Aengus Lynch +4

Steering vectors (SVs) have been proposed as an effective approach to adjust language model behaviour at inference time by intervening on intermediate model activations. They have…

cs.LG2024★ 3 cited

Open RL Benchmark: Comprehensive Tracked Experiments for Reinforcement Learning

Shengyi Huang, Quentin Gallouédec, Florian Felten +30

In many Reinforcement Learning (RL) papers, learning curves are useful indicators to measure the effectiveness of RL algorithms. However, the complete raw data of the learning curv…