3 citations · 3 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarks
Andrew M. Bean, Ryan Othniel Kearns, Angelika Romanou +39
Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is crucial for both assessing their capabilities and identifying safety or robustness issues prior to deployment. Reliably measuring abstrac…
Training language models to be warm and empathetic makes them less reliable and more sycophantic
Lujain Ibrahim, Franziska Sofia Hafner, Luc Rocher
Artificial intelligence (AI) developers are increasingly building language models with warm and empathetic personas that millions of people now use for advice, therapy, and compani…
ELEPHANT: Measuring and understanding social sycophancy in LLMs
Myra Cheng, Sunny Yu, Cinoo Lee +3
LLMs are known to exhibit sycophancy: agreeing with and flattering users, even at the cost of correctness. Prior work measures sycophancy only as direct agreement with users' expli…
Thinking beyond the anthropomorphic paradigm benefits LLM research
Lujain Ibrahim, Myra Cheng
Anthropomorphism, or the attribution of human traits to technology, is an automatic and unconscious response that occurs even in those with advanced technical expertise. In this po…
Multi-turn Evaluation of Anthropomorphic Behaviours in Large Language Models
Lujain Ibrahim, Canfer Akbulut, Rasmi Elasmar +7
The tendency of users to anthropomorphise large language models (LLMs) is of growing interest to AI developers, researchers, and policy-makers. Here, we present a novel method for…