activity
20232026
most citedHow We Define Harm Impacts Data Annotations: Explaining How Annotators Distinguish Hateful, Offensive, and Toxic Comments

1 citations · 2 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CY2026

Characterizing AI Fact-Checkers and Their Contributions on Community Notes

Yilin Gong, Siqi Wu

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have made timely, scalable, and effective fact-checking increasingly feasible. One such deployment is X's Community Notes, which pro…

cs.CY2026

Examining Community-Requested Fact-Checking: Request Alerts Are Associated with Greater Diversity and Visibility of Community Notes

Yilin Gong, Siqi Wu

Crowdsourced fact-checking systems such as Community Notes are increasingly used on social media platforms, yet concerns remain about which content receives scrutiny and how visibl…

cs.SI2025★ 1 cited

Community Notes are Vulnerable to Rater Bias and Manipulation

Bao Tran Truong, Siqi Wu, Alessandro Flammini +2

Social media platforms increasingly rely on crowdsourced moderation systems like Community Notes to combat misinformation at scale. However, these systems face challenges from rate…

cs.CV2025

Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4o(mni) Native Image Generation

Pu Cao, Feng Zhou, Junyi Ji +8

Recently, the visual generation ability by GPT-4o(mni) has been unlocked by OpenAI. It demonstrates a very remarkable generation capability with excellent multimodal condition unde…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

How We Define Harm Impacts Data Annotations: Explaining How Annotators Distinguish Hateful, Offensive, and Toxic Comments

Angela Schöpke-Gonzalez, Siqi Wu, Sagar Kumar +2

Computational social science research has made advances in machine learning and natural language processing that support content moderators in detecting harmful content. These adva…