4 papers · 1 filter
Generate, Evaluate, Iterate: Synthetic Data for Human-in-the-Loop Refinement of LLM Judges
Hyo Jin Do, Zahra Ashktorab, Jasmina Gajcin +5
The LLM-as-a-judge paradigm enables flexible, user-defined evaluation, but its effectiveness is often limited by the scarcity of diverse, representative data for refining criteria.…
EvalAssist: A Human-Centered Tool for LLM-as-a-Judge
Zahra Ashktorab, Werner Geyer, Michael Desmond +6
With the broad availability of large language models and their ability to generate vast outputs using varied prompts and configurations, determining the best output for a given tas…
Aligning Human and LLM Judgments: Insights from EvalAssist on Task-Specific Evaluations and AI-assisted Assessment Strategy Preferences
Zahra Ashktorab, Michael Desmond, Qian Pan +7
Evaluation of large language model (LLM) outputs requires users to make critical judgments about the best outputs across various configurations. This process is costly and takes ti…
Emerging Reliance Behaviors in Human-AI Content Grounded Data Generation: The Role of Cognitive Forcing Functions and Hallucinations
Zahra Ashktorab, Qian Pan, Werner Geyer +5
We investigate the impact of hallucinations and Cognitive Forcing Functions in human-AI collaborative content-grounded data generation, focusing on the use of Large Language Models…