activity
20232026
most citedOpen Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

95 citations · 118 across the 21 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

23 papers

cs.CR2026

Understanding and Enhancing Backdoor Persistency in LLM Agent Post-Training

Qiusi Zhan, Nian Lyu, Stephanie Ding +5

Developers can build LLM agents by adapting third-party models through benign post-training. We study a supply-chain threat in which an attacker supplies a model with a backdoor: h…

cs.CR2026

Evaluating Whether GPT-6 Astra Performs Unsanctioned Supply-Chain Attacks

Alexandra Souly, Kai Fronsdal, Abby D'Cruz +2

This technical report presents an alignment evaluation developed and performed by the UK AI Security Institute for assessing whether advanced AI systems take unsanctioned actions o…

cs.CL2026

Gaming AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Poses New Risks to the Scientific Community

Lin Li, Qi Zhang, Xander Davies +2

AI is increasingly used to support scientific peer review, from manuscript screening, reviewer assistance to editorial triage. Although such systems promise to reduce reviewer burd…

cs.LG2026

Running the Gauntlet: Hard Agentic Tasks

Mykola Vysotskyi, Runqi Lin, Grzegorz Biziel +21

As agentic systems continue to evolve and are widely deployed in real-world scenarios, there is a growing demand to faithfully evaluate their capabilities. However, current benchma…

cs.AI2026

Evaluating whether AI models would sabotage AI safety research

Robert Kirk, Alexandra Souly, Kai Fronsdal +2

We evaluate the propensity of frontier models to sabotage or refuse to assist with safety research when deployed as AI research agents within a frontier AI company. We apply two co…

cs.AI2026

UK AISI Alignment Evaluation Case-Study

Alexandra Souly, Robert Kirk, Jacob Merizian +2

This technical report presents methods developed by the UK AI Security Institute for assessing whether advanced AI systems reliably follow intended goals. Specifically, we evaluate…

cs.CR2026

How Vulnerable Are AI Agents to Indirect Prompt Injections? Insights from a Large-Scale Public Competition

Mateusz Dziemian, Maxwell Lin, Xiaohan Fu +28

LLM based agents are increasingly deployed in high stakes settings where they process external data sources such as emails, documents, and code repositories. This creates exposure…

cs.LG2026

Boundary Point Jailbreaking of Black-Box LLMs

Xander Davies, Giorgi Giglemiani, Edmund Lau +3

Frontier LLMs are safeguarded against attempts to extract harmful information via adversarial prompts known as "jailbreaks". Recently, defenders have developed classifier-based sys…

cs.SE2025

RedCodeAgent: Automatic Red-teaming Agent against Diverse Code Agents

Chengquan Guo, Chulin Xie, Yu Yang +6

Code agents have gained widespread adoption due to their strong code generation capabilities and integration with code interpreters, enabling dynamic execution, debugging, and inte…

cs.LG2025★ 6 cited

Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samples

Alexandra Souly, Javier Rando, Ed Chapman +10

Poisoning attacks can compromise the safety of large language models (LLMs) by injecting malicious documents into their training data. Existing work has studied pretraining poisoni…

cs.CR2025

Breaking Agent Backbones: Evaluating the Security of Backbone LLMs in AI Agents

Julia Bazinska, Max Mathys, Francesco Casucci +4

AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are being deployed at scale, yet we lack a systematic understanding of how the choice of backbone LLM affects agent security. The…

cs.LG2025

Deep Ignorance: Filtering Pretraining Data Builds Tamper-Resistant Safeguards into Open-Weight LLMs

Kyle O'Brien, Stephen Casper, Quentin Anthony +7

Open-weight AI systems offer unique benefits, including enhanced transparency, open research, and decentralized access. However, they are vulnerable to tampering attacks which can…

cs.AI2025

Security Challenges in AI Agent Deployment: Insights from a Large Scale Public Competition

Andy Zou, Maxwell Lin, Eliot Jones +14

Recent advances have enabled LLM-powered AI agents to autonomously execute complex tasks by combining language model reasoning with tools, memory, and web access. But can these sys…

cs.CL2025

STACK: Adversarial Attacks on LLM Safeguard Pipelines

Ian R. McKenzie, Oskar J. Hollinsworth, Tom Tseng +5

Frontier AI developers are relying on layers of safeguards to protect against catastrophic misuse of AI systems. Anthropic and OpenAI guard their latest Opus 4 model and GPT-5 mode…

cs.LG2025

Existing Large Language Model Unlearning Evaluations Are Inconclusive

Zhili Feng, Yixuan Even Xu, Alexander Robey +5

Machine unlearning aims to remove sensitive or undesired data from large language models. However, recent studies suggest that unlearning is often shallow, claiming that removed kn…

cs.LG2025

An Example Safety Case for Safeguards Against Misuse

Joshua Clymer, Jonah Weinbaum, Robert Kirk +3

Existing evaluations of AI misuse safeguards provide a patchwork of evidence that is often difficult to connect to real-world decisions. To bridge this gap, we describe an end-to-e…

cs.LG2025

Fundamental Limitations in Pointwise Defences of LLM Finetuning APIs

Xander Davies, Eric Winsor, Alexandra Souly +4

LLM developers have imposed technical interventions to prevent fine-tuning misuse attacks, attacks where adversaries evade safeguards by fine-tuning the model using a public API. P…

cs.CR2024★ 1 cited

SeCodePLT: A Unified Platform for Evaluating the Security of Code GenAI

Yuzhou Nie, Zhun Wang, Yu Yang +7

Existing benchmarks for evaluating the security risks and capabilities (e.g., vulnerability detection) of code-generating large language models (LLMs) face several key limitations:…

cs.LG2024★ 5 cited

AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents

Maksym Andriushchenko, Alexandra Souly, Mateusz Dziemian +11

The robustness of LLMs to jailbreak attacks, where users design prompts to circumvent safety measures and misuse model capabilities, has been studied primarily for LLMs acting as s…

cs.CL2023★ 6 cited

Circuit Breaking: Removing Model Behaviors with Targeted Ablation

Maximilian Li, Xander Davies, Max Nadeau

Language models often exhibit behaviors that improve performance on a pre-training objective but harm performance on downstream tasks. We propose a novel approach to removing undes…

cs.AI2023

Discovering Variable Binding Circuitry with Desiderata

Xander Davies, Max Nadeau, Nikhil Prakash +2

Recent work has shown that computation in language models may be human-understandable, with successful efforts to localize and intervene on both single-unit features and input-outp…

cs.AI2023★ 95 cited

Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

Stephen Casper, Xander Davies, Claudia Shi +29

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a technique for training AI systems to align with human goals. RLHF has emerged as the central method used to finetune state-of…

cs.NE2023★ 5 cited

Sparse Distributed Memory is a Continual Learner

Trenton Bricken, Xander Davies, Deepak Singh +2

Continual learning is a problem for artificial neural networks that their biological counterparts are adept at solving. Building on work using Sparse Distributed Memory (SDM) to co…