collaborators

32 papers

cs.AI2026

Functional Welfare for AI Safety

Rikhil Jhaveri, Jamie Johnson, Punya Syon Pandey +1

AI welfare is generally treated purely as an ethical issue rather than also as a safety issue. We argue this is a mistake. Whatever their moral status, models exhibit welfare-like…

cs.AI2026

Character Training for Risk-Averse Agents

Arav Dhoot, Punya Syon Pandey, Jamie Johnson +3

Risk aversion in resources could prevent misaligned AI agents from causing catastrophic harm. Misaligned but risk-averse agents would tend to favor safer strategies like making dea…

cs.CL2026

Stress-testing Alignment Midtraining

Sid Baines, Jonathan Bostock, Maria Angelica Martinez +3

When aligning frontier models through post-training techniques, it is not possible to directly demonstrate all of the behaviours we want a model to exhibit in all possible deployme…

cs.CL2026

Inoculation Midtraining with Learned Neologisms

Kyle O'Brien, Edward James Young, Puria Radmard +4

Large language models (LLMs) often learn both desirable and undesirable properties during post-training. We study whether midtraining, an earlier training stage, can shape which of…

cs.CL2026

Last Translation Benchmark

Vilém Zouhar, Niyati Bafna, Mukund Choudhary +263

For scientific progress, we need benchmarks that test the limits of state-of-the-art models, and evaluation methods that inform us about failure cases. As models get stronger, stan…

cs.AI2026

Measuring Activation Control in Large Language Models

Marek Mateusz Kowalski, Joshua Fonseca Rivera, Uzay Macar +1

Safe deployment of increasingly capable models will likely come to rely on latent-space monitoring as a complement to behavioral evaluations, especially when evaluation-aware model…

cs.AI2026

Can AI agents conduct open-ended AI research? Early evidence from two case studies

Peter Kirgis, Sayash Kapoor, Andrew Schwartz +21

Forecasts of explosive AI progress hinge on AI agents automating AI research. But evidence on whether agents can carry out open-ended AI research is thin. Current evaluations eithe…

cs.AI2026

Item Response Theory for AI Safety

Joshua Fonseca Rivera, Neil Shah, David Demitri Africa +1

Language models differ in how safely they behave and these differences are measured by safety benchmarks. But aggregated benchmark scores are hard to trust and interpret, because b…

cs.LG2026

Detecting CSAM Text-to-Image LoRAs From Weights

David Demitri Africa, Cate Heine, Nadine Staes-Polet +1

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning has made it cheap and easy to customize open-weight image generation models for specific tasks, including the production of child sexual abus…

cs.AI2026

Persona Cartography: Charting Language Model Personality Traits in Weight Space

Luke Baines, Anton Gonzalvez Hawthorne, Mariia Koroliuk +4

Large language models exhibit recurring behavioural patterns -- personas -- that shape generalisation and safety, but we lack reliable tools for decomposing, measuring, and control…

cs.CR2026

Tool Use Enables Undetectable Steganography in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Jimmy Laurence Rippin, Simon C. Marshall, David Demitri Africa +1

Increasingly autonomous agentic AI systems pose novel multi-agent risks, such as secret collusion via covert communication channels. The natural defence to these collusion attempts…

cs.CL2026

When Role-playing, Do Models Believe What They Say?

Benjamin Sturgeon, David Africa, Sid Black

Language models can state that "the Earth orbits the Sun" and, when role-playing Aristotle, assert the opposite. Recent work argues that persona adoption is fundamental to how lang…

cs.AI2026

"Did you lie?" Evaluating Lie Detectors across Model Scale and Belief-Verified Model Organisms

Alan Cooney, David Africa, Geoffrey Irving

Robust lie detectors for language models could enable powerful techniques for auditing, monitoring, and post-hoc investigation of model behaviour, but evaluating them requires test…

cs.CL2026

PACUTE: Phonology-, Affix-, and Character-level Understanding of Tokens for Filipino

Jann Railey Montalan, David Demitri Africa, Jimson Paulo Layacan +3

Large language models (LLMs) process text as sequences of subword tokens, which can obscure the character-level and morphological structure that underlies word formation. This limi…

cs.AI2026

Prefill Awareness in Large Language Models

Andy Wang, Parv Mahajan, David Demitri Africa +3

Safety-relevant studies of language models, including alignment and jailbreaking evaluations and AI control protocols, often rely on prefilling model outputs. If AI models can reco…

cs.LG2026

Consistency Training Along the Transformer Stack

Sukrati Gautam, Neil Shah, Arav Dhoot +7

Consistency training encourages models to behave similarly across different contexts, and has shown promise for reducing misalignment. We broaden the scope of consistency training…

cs.CL2026

Consistency Training Can Entrench Misalignment

David Demitri Africa, Arathi Mani

Consistency training encourages a model to produce similar outputs across related inputs or sampling procedures. Such methods are simple, scalable, and largely label-free, but thei…

cs.CL2026

Consistency Training while Mitigating Obfuscation via Rate Matching

Sohaib Imran, Prakhar Gupta, Jannes Elstner +1

Large language models are often influenced by extraneous input features, such as cues revealing a user's preferred answer. Consistency training reduces this influence by training m…

cs.CL2026

LURE: Live-Usage Replay Evaluations for Reducing Evaluation Awareness

Igor Ivanov, David Demitri Africa

Large language models can recognize when they are being evaluated (evaluation awareness) and behave differently because of that, which undermines the validity of safety and alignme…

cs.CL2026

Alignment Pretraining: AI Discourse Causes Self-Fulfilling (Mis)alignment

Cameron Tice, Puria Radmard, Samuel Ratnam +3

Pretraining corpora contain extensive discourse about AI systems, yet the causal influence of this discourse on downstream alignment remains poorly understood. If prevailing descri…

cs.AI2026

A Decision-Theoretic Formalisation of Steganography With Applications to LLM Monitoring

Usman Anwar, Julianna Piskorz, David D. Baek +6

Large language models are beginning to show steganographic capabilities. Such capabilities could allow misaligned models to evade oversight mechanisms. Yet principled methods to de…

cs.AI2025

Does Self-Evaluation Enable Wireheading in Language Models?

David Demitri Africa, Hans Ethan Ting

Self-evaluation is increasingly central to language model training, underpinning techniques from Constitutional AI to self-refinement. We investigate whether coupling self-evaluati…

cs.CL2025

Inoculation Prompting: Eliciting traits from LLMs during training can suppress them at test-time

Daniel Tan, Anders Woodruff, Niels Warncke +4

Language model finetuning often results in learning undesirable traits in combination with desired ones. To address this, we propose inoculation prompting: modifying finetuning dat…

cs.CL2025

Steering Awareness: Detecting Activation Steering from Within

Joshua Fonseca Rivera, David Demitri Africa

Activation steering -- adding a vector to a model's residual stream to modify its behavior -- is widely used in safety evaluations as if the model cannot detect the intervention. W…