6 citations · 10 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability
Alicia Parrish, Rajat Shinde, Sanket Badhe +57
Current AI safety evaluation and benchmarking frameworks predominantly rely on Western-centric culture-agnostic defaults that mask critical regional laws, socio-linguistic nuances,…
AI Benchmark Democratization and Carpentry
Gregor von Laszewski, Wesley Brewer, Jeyan Thiyagalingam +28
Benchmarks are a cornerstone of modern machine learning, enabling reproducibility, comparison, and scientific progress. However, AI benchmarks are increasingly complex, requiring d…
Risk Management for Mitigating Benchmark Failure Modes: BenchRisk
Sean McGregor, Victor Lu, Vassil Tashev +8
Large language model (LLM) benchmarks inform LLM use decisions (e.g., "is this LLM safe to deploy for my use case and context?"). However, benchmarks may be rendered unreliable by…
AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons
Shaona Ghosh, Heather Frase, Adina Williams +99
The rapid advancement and deployment of AI systems have created an urgent need for standard safety-evaluation frameworks. This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehen…
Benchmarking Neural Network Training Algorithms
George E. Dahl, Frank Schneider, Zachary Nado +22
Training algorithms, broadly construed, are an essential part of every deep learning pipeline. Training algorithm improvements that speed up training across a wide variety of workl…