2 citations · 2 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
FramingQA: Does the Question Shape the Answer? Measuring the Compositional Framing Effect
Hazel H. Kim, Andrew M. Bean, Guilherme Affonso Ferreira de Camargo +10
We introduce FramingQA, a benchmark that measures the model sensitivity to question framing across law, medicine, finance, and robotic simulations. Large language models (LLMs) oft…
Single LLM Debate, MoLaCE: Mixture of Latent Concept Experts Against Confirmation Bias
Hazel Kim, Philip Torr
Large language models (LLMs) are highly vulnerable to input confirmation bias. When a prompt implies a preferred answer, models often reinforce that bias rather than explore altern…
Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarks
Andrew M. Bean, Ryan Othniel Kearns, Angelika Romanou +39
Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is crucial for both assessing their capabilities and identifying safety or robustness issues prior to deployment. Reliably measuring abstrac…
Detecting LLM Hallucination Through Layer-wise Information Deficiency: Analysis of Ambiguous Prompts and Unanswerable Questions
Hazel Kim, Tom A. Lamb, Adel Bibi +2
Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate confident yet inaccurate responses, introducing significant risks for deployment in safety-critical domains. We present a novel, te…
How Ambiguous Are the Rationales for Natural Language Reasoning? A Simple Approach to Handling Rationale Uncertainty
Hazel H. Kim
The quality of rationales is essential in the reasoning capabilities of language models. Rationales not only enhance reasoning performance in complex natural language tasks but als…