7 citations · 9 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
Enhancing LLM Planning Capabilities through Intrinsic Self-Critique
Bernd Bohnet, Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Hanie Sedghi +7
We demonstrate an approach for LLMs to critique their \emph{own} answers with the goal of enhancing their performance that leads to significant improvements over established planni…
Training Language Models on the Knowledge Graph: Insights on Hallucinations and Their Detectability
Jiri Hron, Laura Culp, Gamaleldin Elsayed +28
While many capabilities of language models (LMs) improve with increased training budget, the influence of scale on hallucinations is not yet fully understood. Hallucinations come i…
Long-Span Question-Answering: Automatic Question Generation and QA-System Ranking via Side-by-Side Evaluation
Bernd Bohnet, Kevin Swersky, Rosanne Liu +9
We explore the use of long-context capabilities in large language models to create synthetic reading comprehension data from entire books. Previous efforts to construct such datase…
Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Models
Avi Singh, John D. Co-Reyes, Rishabh Agarwal +38
Fine-tuning language models~(LMs) on human-generated data remains a prevalent practice. However, the performance of such models is often limited by the quantity and diversity of hi…
Frontier Language Models are not Robust to Adversarial Arithmetic, or "What do I need to say so you agree 2+2=5?
C. Daniel Freeman, Laura Culp, Aaron Parisi +27
We introduce and study the problem of adversarial arithmetic, which provides a simple yet challenging testbed for language model alignment. This problem is comprised of arithmetic…